Bug#333858: initrd/initramfs: we discussed enough, let's take some action now :)

2005-10-15 Thread Sven Luther
On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 09:42:54PM +0200, Erik van Konijnenburg wrote: > On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 06:15:04PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > I would really like to have the choice of both approaches, also for > > less common tasks like switching from 2.4 or preparing an alien bootup > > (either f

Bug#333858: initrd/initramfs: we discussed enough, let's take some action now :)

2005-10-15 Thread Erik van Konijnenburg
On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 06:15:04PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 16:34:57 +0200 Erik van Konijnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 08:57:31AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 08:47:57AM +0200, Erik van Konijnenburg wrote: >

Bug#333858: initrd/initramfs: we discussed enough, let's take some action now :)

2005-10-15 Thread Sven Luther
On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 04:34:57PM +0200, Erik van Konijnenburg wrote: > On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 08:57:31AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 08:47:57AM +0200, Erik van Konijnenburg wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 12:53:41PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > Hey, i didn

Bug#333858: initrd/initramfs: we discussed enough, let's take some action now :)

2005-10-15 Thread Sven Luther
On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 11:41:07AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 08:57:31 +0200 > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > The patch claims support for 2.6.8, which is where development > > > started, but later yaird

Bug#333858: initrd/initramfs: we discussed enough, let's take some action now :)

2005-10-15 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 17:51:40 +0200 Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, etch will not ship with a 2.6.8 kernel, so the upgrade path to > 2.6.8 is not something we need to concern ourself with. the upgrade > path from 2.6.8 is another mather,

Bug#333858: initrd/initramfs: we discussed enough, let's take some action now :)

2005-10-15 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [trimming recipients to lessen duplicates] On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 16:34:57 +0200 Erik van Konijnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 08:57:31AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 08:47:57AM +0200, Erik van Konij

Bug#333858: initrd/initramfs: we discussed enough, let's take some action now :)

2005-10-15 Thread Erik van Konijnenburg
On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 08:57:31AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 08:47:57AM +0200, Erik van Konijnenburg wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 12:53:41PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Hey, i didn't know the mkinitrd wrapper was shell, or i would have done it > myself. I wonde

Bug#333858: initrd/initramfs: we discussed enough, let's take some action now :)

2005-10-15 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [responding only to the bugreport, not d-k] On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 08:57:31 +0200 Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey, i didn't know the mkinitrd wrapper was shell, or i would have > done it myself. I wonder why you need the : > > if [ "$sup

Bug#333858: initrd/initramfs: we discussed enough, let's take some action now :)

2005-10-15 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 08:57:31 +0200 Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The patch claims support for 2.6.8, which is where development > > started, but later yaird versions only have had testing with > > newer kernels. If we could get away with

Bug#333858: initrd/initramfs: we discussed enough, let's take some action now :)

2005-10-15 Thread Sven Luther
On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 08:47:57AM +0200, Erik van Konijnenburg wrote: > On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 12:53:41PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > That said, I also think I should be able to implement those options to > > the mkinitrd.yaird wrapper - if upstream doesn't beat me to it ;-). > > Is that