On 2006-06-24 John Belmonte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> However for gnutls libgnutls-dev is no virtual package but a real one,
>> there is no libgnutls13-dev. So it would not be xmlsec1 not implementing
>> DLP but gnutls.
> I see. So why has gnutls removed the sonumber
Andreas Metzler wrote:
> However for gnutls libgnutls-dev is no virtual package but a real one,
> there is no libgnutls13-dev. So it would not be xmlsec1 not implementing
> DLP but gnutls.
I see. So why has gnutls removed the sonumber from the -dev package?
It may make your transitions appear eas
On 2006-06-23 John Belmonte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James Westby wrote:
[...]
> > -Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4.0.0), autotools-dev, pkg-config,
> > libxml2-dev, libxslt1-dev, libssl-dev (>= 0.9.7), libgnutls11-dev,
> > libnss3-dev
> > +Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4.0.0), autotools-dev, p
James Westby wrote:
> tags 335771 patch
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> I rebuilt xmlsec1 with the attatched (trivial) patch and it seemed to
> build fine. I didn't test the resulting package however.
>
> James
>
...
> -Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4.0.0), autotools-dev, pkg-config, libxml2-dev,
> libxsl
tags 335771 patch
thanks
Hi,
I rebuilt xmlsec1 with the attatched (trivial) patch and it seemed to
build fine. I didn't test the resulting package however.
James
--
James Westby
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jameswestby.net/
diff -u xmlsec1-1.2.9/debian/control xmlsec1-1.2.9/debian/control
-
5 matches
Mail list logo