Bug#335771: Please use gnutls13 instead of gnutls11

2006-06-24 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2006-06-24 John Belmonte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andreas Metzler wrote: >> However for gnutls libgnutls-dev is no virtual package but a real one, >> there is no libgnutls13-dev. So it would not be xmlsec1 not implementing >> DLP but gnutls. > I see. So why has gnutls removed the sonumber

Bug#335771: Please use gnutls13 instead of gnutls11

2006-06-24 Thread John Belmonte
Andreas Metzler wrote: > However for gnutls libgnutls-dev is no virtual package but a real one, > there is no libgnutls13-dev. So it would not be xmlsec1 not implementing > DLP but gnutls. I see. So why has gnutls removed the sonumber from the -dev package? It may make your transitions appear eas

Bug#335771: Please use gnutls13 instead of gnutls11

2006-06-24 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2006-06-23 John Belmonte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > James Westby wrote: [...] > > -Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4.0.0), autotools-dev, pkg-config, > > libxml2-dev, libxslt1-dev, libssl-dev (>= 0.9.7), libgnutls11-dev, > > libnss3-dev > > +Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4.0.0), autotools-dev, p

Bug#335771: Please use gnutls13 instead of gnutls11

2006-06-23 Thread John Belmonte
James Westby wrote: > tags 335771 patch > thanks > > Hi, > > I rebuilt xmlsec1 with the attatched (trivial) patch and it seemed to > build fine. I didn't test the resulting package however. > > James > ... > -Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4.0.0), autotools-dev, pkg-config, libxml2-dev, > libxsl

Bug#335771: Please use gnutls13 instead of gnutls11

2006-06-22 Thread James Westby
tags 335771 patch thanks Hi, I rebuilt xmlsec1 with the attatched (trivial) patch and it seemed to build fine. I didn't test the resulting package however. James -- James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jameswestby.net/ diff -u xmlsec1-1.2.9/debian/control xmlsec1-1.2.9/debian/control -