Bug#352569: fmtutil: Error. Apparent jadetex involvement. packages left unconfigured.

2006-02-13 Thread Norbert Preining
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Norbert Preining wrote: > > I don't even remember in which bug we discussed it (probably it was in > > connection with jadetex), but does anybody remember any serious > > arguments against the quick-and-dirty solution of removing the old > > formats in /var/lib/texmf/web2c? >

Bug#352569: fmtutil: Error. Apparent jadetex involvement. packages left unconfigured.

2006-02-13 Thread Norbert Preining
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Frank Küster wrote: > >> > `etex -ini -jobname=jadetex -progname=jadetex &latex jadetex.ini' failed > >> > `pdfetex -ini -jobname=pdfjadetex -progname=pdfjadetex &pdflatex > >> > pdfjadetex.ini' failed > >> > > > I don't even remember in which bug we discussed it (probably

Bug#352569: fmtutil: Error. Apparent jadetex involvement. packages left unconfigured.

2006-02-13 Thread Norbert Preining
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Frank Küster wrote: > >> > `pdfetex -ini -jobname=pdfjadetex -progname=pdfjadetex &pdflatex > >> > pdfjadetex.ini' failed > > It's the same problem already discussed earlier: fmtutil generates the > formats in a temporary directory, but the ones in /var/lib/texmf are > stil

Bug#352569: fmtutil: Error. Apparent jadetex involvement. packages left unconfigured.

2006-02-13 Thread Frank Küster
Ross Boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 09:40:52PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: >> Ross Boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > This is a summary of all `failed' messages and warnings: >> > `etex -ini -jobname=jadetex -progname=jadetex &latex jadetex.ini' failed >> > `pd

Bug#352569: fmtutil: Error. Apparent jadetex involvement. packages left unconfigured.

2006-02-12 Thread Ross Boylan
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 09:40:52PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: > Ross Boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > This is a summary of all `failed' messages and warnings: > > `etex -ini -jobname=jadetex -progname=jadetex &latex jadetex.ini' failed > > `pdfetex -ini -jobname=pdfjadetex -progname=pdfja

Bug#352569: fmtutil: Error. Apparent jadetex involvement. packages left unconfigured.

2006-02-12 Thread Frank Küster
Ross Boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Any info on whether my tetex system is safe to use, and work-arounds > if it is not, would be great. Thanks. I'm pretty sure that everything but jadetex is fine. But safe it is, anyway - it will never destroy any input files, will it? More to the proble

Bug#352569: fmtutil: Error. Apparent jadetex involvement. packages left unconfigured.

2006-02-12 Thread Frank Küster
Ross Boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is a summary of all `failed' messages and warnings: > `etex -ini -jobname=jadetex -progname=jadetex &latex jadetex.ini' failed > `pdfetex -ini -jobname=pdfjadetex -progname=pdfjadetex &pdflatex > pdfjadetex.ini' failed > > fmtutil failed. Output has