Package: qof
Version: 0.6.4-1
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> creating test-book-merge
> cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I. -I../ -I../../qof -I../../lib/libsql
> -I.. -I../.. -I../../.. -I../../qof -I/usr/include/libxml2
> -I/usr/i
Hi Frederick,
Could you test this patch for me?
I hope it's simply a typo in the selection of the unsigned macro instead of
the signed. I can then arrange to include the patch in a -2 upload.
Thanks.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com
Hi Frederick,
Try this one instead! (Oops, sent you a patch made against a local copy
instead of the released source.)
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
--- qof-0.6.4/qof/test/test-date.c 2005-10-23 1
Hello,
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 07:45:20PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> Could you test this patch for me?
I would like to, but the patch does not apply. Investigating by hand,
it seems the diff is against an even newer version than in 0.6.4-1:
if (!ok || always_print)
{
fprintf (stderr,
On Friday 21 April 2006 11:36 pm, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 07:45:20PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> > Could you test this patch for me?
>
> I would like to, but the patch does not apply. Investigating by hand,
> it seems the diff is against an even newer version than in 0.
Hello,
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 08:08:36PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> The second patch I sent has been reported to fail by other 64bit testers so
> I've got - what I hope - is the proper solution and it's tested against the
> original source.
it works now :-)
Best regards
Frederik Schueler
6 matches
Mail list logo