Package: svn-buildpackage
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
The usage of .svn/deb-layout seems a little bit not-so-comfortable.
Probably it would be a good idea to have all the properties in the
.svn/deb-layout stored as svn properties. This way an fresh checkout
could be built imediately and deb-layout
#include
* Eddy Petrişor [Wed, Jun 14 2006, 11:27:24AM]:
> Package: svn-buildpackage
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hello,
>
> The usage of .svn/deb-layout seems a little bit not-so-comfortable.
Because?
> Probably it would be a good idea to have all the properties in the
Probably? What does that m
On 6/14/06, Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
#include
* Eddy Petrişor [Wed, Jun 14 2006, 11:27:24AM]:
> Package: svn-buildpackage
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hello,
>
> The usage of .svn/deb-layout seems a little bit not-so-comfortable.
Because?
Because is some information which should be
#include
* Eddy Petrişor [Wed, Jun 14 2006, 11:00:02PM]:
> Relative paths should be better and not client specific.
> If one has .svn/deb-layout or some (~/.|/etc/)svn-buildpackage.conf
> and there are also svn properties, local settings should be
> prioritary.
>
> Ok, the main problem I would l
On 6/15/06, Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
#include
* Eddy Petrişor [Wed, Jun 14 2006, 11:00:02PM]:
> Relative paths should be better and not client specific.
> If one has .svn/deb-layout or some (~/.|/etc/)svn-buildpackage.conf
> and there are also svn properties, local settings shoul
#include
* Eddy Petrişor [Thu, Jun 15 2006, 02:34:07PM]:
> On 6/15/06, Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >#include
> >* Eddy Petrişor [Wed, Jun 14 2006, 11:00:02PM]:
> >
> >> Relative paths should be better and not client specific.
> >> If one has .svn/deb-layout or some (~/.|/etc/)svn-bu
6 matches
Mail list logo
