Bug#431935: Resolver deleting packages

2007-07-28 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 05:00:30PM +0200, Jiří Paleček <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > Yes, this seems to work. Great, I don't need the big compressed file in that case. Thanks, Daniel

Bug#431935: Resolver deleting packages

2007-07-28 Thread Jiří Paleček
On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 16:36:59 +0200, Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 07:18:43AM -0700, Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 01:08:52AM +0200, Jiří Paleček <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 15:

Bug#431935: Resolver deleting packages

2007-07-28 Thread Jiří Paleček
On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 16:18:43 +0200, Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 01:08:52AM +0200, Jiří Paleček <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 15:27:52 +0200, Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The darcs problem is basicly the same, a ha

Bug#431935: Resolver deleting packages

2007-07-28 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 07:18:43AM -0700, Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 01:08:52AM +0200, Jiří Paleček <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > was heard to say: > > On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 15:27:52 +0200, Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > The darcs pro

Bug#431935: Resolver deleting packages

2007-07-28 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 01:08:52AM +0200, Jiří Paleček <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 15:27:52 +0200, Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > The darcs problem is basicly the same, a hand installed package is marked > as auto. The difference is that in the darc

Bug#431935: Resolver deleting packages

2007-07-27 Thread Jiří Paleček
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 15:27:52 +0200, Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 12:15:22PM +0200, Jiří Paleček <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: The attached patch should do the trick; it separates the case of "install a new package" from the case of "install a di

Bug#431935: Resolver deleting packages

2007-07-27 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 12:15:22PM +0200, Jiří Paleček <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: >> The attached patch should do the trick; it separates the case of >> "install a new package" from the case of "install a different version of >> an already-installed package". Does it work for you? >

Bug#431935: Resolver deleting packages

2007-07-27 Thread Jiří Paleček
Hello, On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 04:22:51 +0200, Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 03:51:49AM +0200, Jiří Paleček <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: I have also experienced this bug, with openoffice packages but also other. I have a feeling this is a separ

Bug#431935: Resolver deleting packages

2007-07-26 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 03:51:49AM +0200, Jiří Paleček <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > I have also experienced this bug, with openoffice packages but also other. I have a feeling this is a separate problem from the original one, since the submitter said the packages being removed weren'

Bug#431935: Resolver deleting packages

2007-07-25 Thread Jiří Paleček
Hello, I have also experienced this bug, with openoffice packages but also other. For example, say I want to install darcs. So I press + on darcs, and there are two versions of darcs in the archive. According to my preferences, the lower one is selected. However, that version is uninstallable on