Bug#459436: cowdancer: put cowbuilder in it's own package

Hi, On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 09:04:09AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: [...] > I wonder how small it would become. I'm not too keen on splitting > packages too much. pbuilder doesn't pull in any GUI tools, so it's not > too bad. > > Is it worth splitting? What about turning the dependency-on-pbuil

Bug#459436: cowdancer: put cowbuilder in it's own package

Hi, > > recently I wanted to install cowdancer to try cow-shell, but > unfortunately it brought a whole lot of dependencies due to the pbuilder > dependency. Since cow-shell may be useful on it's own (e.g. working with > hardlinked copies of large source trees) I'd suggest to move cowbuilder > (a

Bug#459436: cowdancer: put cowbuilder in it's own package

Package: cowdancer Version: 0.44 Severity: wishlist Hi Junichi, recently I wanted to install cowdancer to try cow-shell, but unfortunately it brought a whole lot of dependencies due to the pbuilder dependency. Since cow-shell may be useful on it's own (e.g. working with hardlinked copies of large