Bug#460499: lintian: No need to warn about missing short-description LSB header in init.d scripts

2008-01-15 Thread Joerg Jaspert
On 11263 March 1977, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: Do you think we should drop it completely or just reduce it to info? Reducing it to info is probably good. Keep it at warning and the situation will change over time and packages get that header. -- bye Joerg [GFDL] Well, Debian is not for

Bug#460499: lintian: No need to warn about missing short-description LSB header in init.d scripts

2008-01-13 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
Package: lintian Version: 1.23.41 Now that the LSB headers in init.d scripts is more used, it has become obvious that the lintian warning about missing short-description is not needed. As far as I know, there is nothing using this header, and quite a lot of scripts are missing it. It is only

Bug#460499: lintian: No need to warn about missing short-description LSB header in init.d scripts

2008-01-13 Thread Russ Allbery
Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Package: lintian Version: 1.23.41 Now that the LSB headers in init.d scripts is more used, it has become obvious that the lintian warning about missing short-description is not needed. As far as I know, there is nothing using this header, and

Bug#460499: lintian: No need to warn about missing short-description LSB header in init.d scripts

2008-01-13 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Russ Allbery] Do you think we should drop it completely or just reduce it to info? Reducing it to info is probably good. I think having a description is rather nice and may help figure out where an init script abandoned by some previous package came from without having to do as much