On 11263 March 1977, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Do you think we should drop it completely or just reduce it to info?
Reducing it to info is probably good.
Keep it at warning and the situation will change over time and packages
get that header.
--
bye Joerg
[GFDL]
Well, Debian is not for
Package: lintian
Version: 1.23.41
Now that the LSB headers in init.d scripts is more used, it has become
obvious that the lintian warning about missing short-description is
not needed. As far as I know, there is nothing using this header, and
quite a lot of scripts are missing it. It is only
Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package: lintian
Version: 1.23.41
Now that the LSB headers in init.d scripts is more used, it has become
obvious that the lintian warning about missing short-description is
not needed. As far as I know, there is nothing using this header, and
[Russ Allbery]
Do you think we should drop it completely or just reduce it to info?
Reducing it to info is probably good.
I think having a description is rather nice and may help figure out
where an init script abandoned by some previous package came from
without having to do as much
4 matches
Mail list logo