Rogério Brito schrieb:
Nice to know that. Oh, just one thing (I have not checked the svn repo
yet): are you compiling djbfft as a shared object?
I tried out the Gentoo patch which builds the library into a shared
onject (and it works fine), but I decided against it because (1) the
djbfft code
Hi, Fabian.
On Apr 27 2009, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Rogério Brito schrieb:
>> I'm not sure right now, but I think that some functions of lame (OK, not
>> packaged in Debian) and lossywav (still not packaged) might benefit from
>> a Fast Fourier Transform.
>
> I have prepared djbft packages in th
Rogério Brito schrieb:
I'm not sure right now, but I think that some functions of lame (OK, not
packaged in Debian) and lossywav (still not packaged) might benefit from
a Fast Fourier Transform.
I have prepared djbft packages in the pkg-multimedia SVN that are
ready for upload IMHO. I packaged
Hi.
On Apr 25 2009, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Rogerio Brito writes:
> > Is there any progress on this? Any updates?
>
> Is there a package that actually and actually benefits from djbfft?
I'm not sure right now, but I think that some functions of lame (OK, not
packaged in Debian) and lossywav (
Rogerio Brito writes:
> Is there any progress on this? Any updates?
Is there a package that actually and actually benefits from djbfft?
--
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscrib
5 matches
Mail list logo