Hi,
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 10:54:10AM +0100, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 05:32:48PM -0400, Forest Bond wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:14:25PM +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> > > On 0, Forest Bond wrote:
> > > > * Why all of the Debian-specific utilities in debian/utils
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 11:06:33AM +0100, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 09:39:20AM -0400, Forest Bond wrote:
> > * Why does mldonkey-server need an init script? Yes, it's a daemon,
> >but that is merely an implementation detail. When it comes down to
> >it, mldonk
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 10:54:10AM +0100, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 05:32:48PM -0400, Forest Bond wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:14:25PM +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> > > On 0, Forest Bond wrote:
> > > > * Why all of the Debian-specific utilities in debian/utils
Hello,
On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 09:39:20AM -0400, Forest Bond wrote:
> Package: mldonkey
> Severity: normal
>
> mldonkey packaging is way to complicated and bloated. This is
> unnecessary and causes bugs.
>
> * Why does mldonkey-server need an init script? Yes, it's a daemon,
>but that is m
Hello,
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 05:32:48PM -0400, Forest Bond wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:14:25PM +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> > On 0, Forest Bond wrote:
> > > * Why all of the Debian-specific utilities in debian/utils? This is
> > >just vanity. Please, ship the upstream software,
Forest Bond writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:14:25PM +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
>> On 0, Forest Bond wrote:
>> > * Why all of the Debian-specific utilities in debian/utils? This is
>> >just vanity. Please, ship the upstream software, not your own.
>> >
>>
>> I won't insult
Hi,
Forest Bond schrieb:
> Can you point me to some documentation of the multiuser functionality?
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/mldonkey/distrib/multiuser.txt?root=mldonkey&view=markup
Cheers, spiralvoice
__
Nur b
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:14:25PM +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 0, Forest Bond wrote:
> > mldonkey packaging is way to complicated and bloated. This is
> > unnecessary and causes bugs.
> >
> > * Why so many debconf questions?
>
> You're right. Maybe we can simplify this a bit. We are
Hi,
Sorry for the late reply.
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 11:05:41AM +0200, spiral voice wrote:
> > Why does mldonkey-server need an init script? Yes, it's a daemon,
> > but that is merely an implementation detail. When it comes down to
> > it, mldonkey is a *p2p client*. It should be run by norma
merge 332324 484674
thanks
On 0, Forest Bond wrote:
>
> mldonkey packaging is way to complicated and bloated. This is
> unnecessary and causes bugs.
>
> * Why so many debconf questions?
>
You're right. Maybe we can simplify this a bit. We are currently
working on this problem. This is the
Hi,
> Why does mldonkey-server need an init script? Yes, it's a daemon,
> but that is merely an implementation detail. When it comes down to
> it, mldonkey is a *p2p client*. It should be run by normal users
> when they want to connect to a p2p network.
YVMV, but MLDonkey is also designed to
Package: mldonkey
Severity: normal
mldonkey packaging is way to complicated and bloated. This is
unnecessary and causes bugs.
* Why does mldonkey-server need an init script? Yes, it's a daemon,
but that is merely an implementation detail. When it comes down to
it, mldonkey is a *p2p cli
12 matches
Mail list logo
