Christian Ohm wrote:
Hello,
The current bacula packages depend on python2.4 again (on i386 at least).
Best regards,
Christian Ohm
Err, what version do you mean when you say current? This should have
been fixed.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Sunday, 16 November 2008 at 7:57, John Goerzen wrote:
Err, what version do you mean when you say current? This should have
been fixed.
After installing 2.4.2-3.1 I removed python2.4, now 2.4.3-1 depends on it
again:
$ apt-cache show bacula-fd
Package: bacula-fd
Priority: optional
Section:
OK. I thought the NMU fixed this, but apparently it didn't. Checked in
a patch.
Christian Ohm wrote:
On Sunday, 16 November 2008 at 7:57, John Goerzen wrote:
Err, what version do you mean when you say current? This should have
been fixed.
After installing 2.4.2-3.1 I removed python2.4,
Hello,
The current bacula packages depend on python2.4 again (on i386 at least).
Best regards,
Christian Ohm
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
4 matches
Mail list logo