Bug#520558: please re-open or reconsider

2009-10-02 Thread Paul Traina
Unfortunately, the new dependency based stuff (depricating sysv-rc) breaks amavis. Yes, amavis can depend upon a lot of stuff needing to start, so it SHOULD start after those things, if they exist and are installed. The LSB stuff in /etc/init.d/amavisd-new should be tweaked or auto- generate

Bug#520558: please re-open or reconsider

2009-10-02 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Fri, 02 Oct 2009, Paul Traina wrote: > Yes, amavis can depend upon a lot of stuff needing to start, so it > SHOULD start after those things, if they exist and are installed. > > The LSB stuff in /etc/init.d/amavisd-new should be tweaked or auto- > generated to fix this. The only way we could a

Bug#520558: please re-open or reconsider

2009-10-02 Thread Paul Traina
So upon doing some more research and work, and testing on MY system, this is, I believe, the correct answer for most installations, and should not cause any problems for any installations: ### BEGIN INIT INFO # Provides: amavisd-new # Required-Start:$syslog $network $local_fs $ne

Bug#520558: please re-open or reconsider

2009-10-03 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Fri, 02 Oct 2009, Paul Traina wrote: > So upon doing some more research and work, and testing on MY system, > this is, I believe, the correct answer for most installations, and > should not cause any problems for any installations: > > ### BEGIN INIT INFO > # Provides: amavisd-new > #

Bug#520558: please re-open or reconsider

2009-10-03 Thread Paul Traina
I did look at the docs before sending in the fragment. In no place in the LSB documentation does remote_fs imply that local_fs has already happened, so technically, having both is a good thing. Many scripts have both. /usr can technically be remote_fs. I was trying to change as little

Bug#520558: please re-open or reconsider

2009-10-03 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sat, 03 Oct 2009, Paul Traina wrote: > I did look at the docs before sending in the fragment. In no place > in the LSB documentation does remote_fs imply that local_fs has > already happened, so technically, having both is a good thing. Many So, we list both. > >Do we need clamav-daemon in

Bug#520558: please re-open or reconsider

2009-10-04 Thread Alexander Wirt
Paul Traina schrieb am Freitag, den 02. Oktober 2009: > So upon doing some more research and work, and testing on MY system, > this is, I believe, the correct answer for most installations, and > should not cause any problems for any installations: I still disagree that this should defined by us.

Bug#520558: please re-open or reconsider

2009-10-04 Thread Alexander Wirt
Paul Traina schrieb am Sonntag, den 04. Oktober 2009: > It's perfectly reasonable to put ALL of them under the should > section if amavis needs them running first. There is no all. Since its perl and its customizable you can't know every service it uses or is able to use. Alex -- To UNSUBS

Bug#520558: please re-open or reconsider

2009-10-04 Thread Paul Traina
It's perfectly reasonable to put ALL of them under the should section if amavis needs them running first. On Oct 4, 2009, at 3:28 AM, Alexander Wirt wrote: Paul Traina schrieb am Freitag, den 02. Oktober 2009: So upon doing some more research and work, and testing on MY system, this is, I