>Ho ho ho, still a disaster, and even in experimental, there is no such a
>high numbered kernel yet. Alas, must do
># dpkg -i xserver-xorg-video-intel_2%3a2.6.1-1_i386.deb
># aptitude forbid-version xserver-xorg-video-intel
Can you please tell me where could I find
xserver-xorg-video-intel_2%3a2.6
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 11:52:53 +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
> We need your full X log, as usual... Make sure you're using 2.6.29 or
> even 2.6.30-rc since recent intel drivers like recent kernels (2.7.99.1
> enforces UXA which requires GEM anyway).
>
UXA has supposedly been fixed to work without
Brice Goglin writes:
> We need your full X log, as usual... Make sure you're using 2.6.29
Roger. Here you go my man. .old is the unhappy new run.
Don't worry about 'dlopen of /usr/lib/dri/swrast_dri.so failed'. I
purged that package momentarily but it didn't make any difference.
Xorg.0.log.bz2
jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
> found 526169 2:2.7.99.1-1
> severity 526169 grave
> retitle 526169 can't even read the login screen
> thanks
> 2:2.7.99.1-1 is a little better. At least the Debian logo is readable
> on the xdm login screen, but still not any other words.
>
We need your full X log,
found 526169 2:2.7.99.1-1
severity 526169 grave
retitle 526169 can't even read the login screen
thanks
2:2.7.99.1-1 is a little better. At least the Debian logo is readable
on the xdm login screen, but still not any other words.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.
5 matches
Mail list logo
