On Sun, 10 May 2009, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > Moreover, we must make sure that we never run mktexlsr without arguments
> > in maintainer scripts - otherwise /u/l/s/texmf/ls-R will be created.
>
> I think that's your duty as maintainers, to make sure the software behaves
> like all the rest, ie fo
Hi,
Frank, Norbert, I do appreciate your time spent on this!
On Sonntag, 10. Mai 2009, Frank Küster wrote:
> However, we should try to remember whether there's a reason for this
> construction, other than that we arranged the files in analogy to
> /usr/share/texmf{,-texlive}?
I _guess_ that's th
On Sun, 10 May 2009, Frank Küster wrote:
> >> +# remove the symlink in TEXMFLOCAL, ignoring failures if /usr/local is
> >> ro rm -f /usr/local/share/texmf/ls-R 2>/dev/null || true
> >
> > you must neither delete nor create files in /usr/local (see policy 9.1.2 :)
Ok, then we just leave it ther
Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sonntag, 10. Mai 2009, Frank Küster wrote:
>> We have simply forgotten to add the line in postrm. Here's a patch:
>
> Heh. (+np, happens.)
>
>> +# remove the symlink in TEXMFLOCAL, ignoring failures if /usr/local is
>> ro rm -f /usr/local/share/texmf/ls-R 2>/
Hi,
On Sonntag, 10. Mai 2009, Frank Küster wrote:
> We have simply forgotten to add the line in postrm. Here's a patch:
Heh. (+np, happens.)
> +# remove the symlink in TEXMFLOCAL, ignoring failures if /usr/local is
> ro rm -f /usr/local/share/texmf/ls-R 2>/dev/null || true
you must neither
Holger Levsen wrote:
> This doesnt happen as you could have seen in the attached log.
We have simply forgotten to add the line in postrm. Here's a patch:
--- postrm.in (revision 3893)
+++ postrm.in (working copy)
@@ -35,8 +35,9 @@
# purge texmf.cnf which is generated by update-texmf u
Holger Levsen wrote:
>> That is a _should_ requirement and reading the start of the policy you
>> could see that
>
> ... thats right, but...
>
>> So please refrain from playing with severities without checking the
>> details.
>
> I'm setting the severity based on the release goals for squeeze, se
reopen 528021
reassign 528021 tex-common
sorry
On Sonntag, 10. Mai 2009, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Well, your bug was anyway for the wrong package, since /u/l/s/texmf is
> created by tex-common, not by texlive-*.
ok.
> ANd in tex-common see #475077.
thanks. (but that bug is about creating that
Hi Norbert,
On Sonntag, 10. Mai 2009, prein...@logic.at wrote:
> > 1m32.5s ERROR: FAIL: Package purging left files on system:
> > /usr/local/share/texmf not owned
>
> Aehm, wrong. That is not a file under dpkg control. There is a
> different bug report about that we have to create /u
severity 528021 wishlist
retitle 528021 please purge /usr/local/share/texmf if empty
thanks
On Sun, 10 May 2009, Holger Levsen wrote:
> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on the
> system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8:
>
> http://www.debian.or
10 matches
Mail list logo
