On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 01:27:06PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>
> >> If you agree with this, the next manpages{,dev} upload will replace
> >> libc-bin
> >> with appropriate version, then you can drop them.
>
> Please go ahead. (I'm not an eglibc maintainer, but it seems so
> obviously the ri
Simon Paillard wrote:
> Do you have a position regarding this ?
[...]
> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 11:48:51PM +0200, Simon Paillard wrote:
>> If you agree with this, the next manpages{,dev} upload will replace libc-bin
>> with appropriate version, then you can drop them.
Please go ahead. (I'm not
Hi,
Do you have a position regarding this ?
TL;DR: better manpages may be provided by manpages pkg:
http://people.debian.org/~spaillard/libc-or-manpages/
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 11:48:51PM +0200, Simon Paillard wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 12:34:55AM +0100, Petr Baudis wrote:
> > Package: li
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 12:34:55AM +0100, Petr Baudis wrote:
> Package: libc-bin
> Version: 2.10.1-5
> Severity: wishlist
>
> The Debian glibc package introduces a number of custom manual pages
> which are not in any kind of upstream and thus cannot be shared with
> the rest of Linux communit
4 matches
Mail list logo