Also discussing the more general issue of selective bootup fsck in
#408954 as of recently.
> Is it ok for you, to create a dummy fsck.ubifs in parallel to
> fsck.nfs?
If we decide to go that way, I think it would be better to modify
the fsck.nfs script to make it generic, and just symlink it for
[Ron]
> So it is indeed ignoring the fstab option I set for it:
>
> /dev/root / ubifs defaults,noatime,rw 0 0
If so, I suspect this is the same as bug #592427, which have an
untested fix in svn for version 2.88dsf-12 but not uploaded yet.
Happy hacking,
--
Petter Reinholdtsen
--
To UNS
Hi,
Just some followup on this one ...
> Does it not work to specify in /etc/fstab that the file system should
> not be checked? If no fsck is available for ubifs, which program is
> used to do the fsck-ing? I thought fsck used fsck.$type to do the
> actual fsck operation.
This is what I'm se
* Petter Reinholdtsen [100224 13:02]:
> [Bart Trojanowski]
> > I am running on a SheevaPlug. I installed Debian on a UBIFS
> > filesystem. This filesystem does not require/have fsck. That
> > wouldn't be so bad if checkroot.sh didn't forcefully create a
> > /dev/root and try to fsck it.
>
> Do
[Bart Trojanowski]
> I am running on a SheevaPlug. I installed Debian on a UBIFS
> filesystem. This filesystem does not require/have fsck. That
> wouldn't be so bad if checkroot.sh didn't forcefully create a
> /dev/root and try to fsck it.
Does it not work to specify in /etc/fstab that the file
Package: initscripts
Version: 2.87dsf-8
Severity: normal
checkroot.sh has this comment:
# Disabled AC power check until fsck can be told to only check the
# file system if it is corrupt when running on battery. (bug #526398)
and then it forces rootcheck to 'yes'.
I am running on a SheevaPlug.
6 matches
Mail list logo