Bug#659732: closed by Luca Falavigna (Re: Bug#659732: ftp.debian.org: arch changed from "all" to "amd64 i386" for broadcom-sta package)

2012-02-20 Thread Luk Claes
On 02/20/2012 02:43 PM, Luca Falavigna wrote: > Hi Cyril, > > Il 20 febbraio 2012 12:42, Cyril Lacoux ha scritto: >> Package's page is still reporting that an older version - 5.100.82.38-1 - is >> present in the archive[1], but the files seem not to be there[2], this would >> be interresting for

Bug#659732: closed by Luca Falavigna (Re: Bug#659732: ftp.debian.org: arch changed from "all" to "amd64 i386" for broadcom-sta package)

2012-02-20 Thread Luca Falavigna
Hi Cyril, Il 20 febbraio 2012 12:42, Cyril Lacoux ha scritto: > Package's page is still reporting that an older version - 5.100.82.38-1 - is > present in the archive[1], but the files seem not to be there[2], this would > be interresting for us to know why. It's probably an issue of packages.d.o

Bug#659732: closed by Luca Falavigna (Re: Bug#659732: ftp.debian.org: arch changed from "all" to "amd64 i386" for broadcom-sta package)

2012-02-20 Thread Cyril Lacoux
Le samedi 18 février 2012 14:19:58, vous avez écrit : > Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 15:34:09 + > Ftpmaster: Alexander Reichle-Schmehl > Suite: unstable > Binaries: > broadcom-sta-source_5.100.82.112-5 [all] > Reason: [auto-cruft] no longer built from source Hi Luca, Could you please explain us wh

Bug#659732: ftp.debian.org: arch changed from "all" to "amd64 i386" for broadcom-sta package

2012-02-13 Thread Cyril Lacoux
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Dear ftp masters, I recently uploaded (actually, my sponsor did...) a new version of the package broadcom-sta[1], one of the changes was to set architecture to "amd64 i386" because this package is only valid for these archs. Since that, it is only availabl