Package: lsb
Version: 3.2-28.1
Severity: wishlist
Hi there,
Please find attached a patch for lsb that adds a new helper function to
/lib/lsb/init-functions to support maintainer scripts that should behave as
no-ops because the package is upstart-aware and upstart is in use.
I'm proposing this ch
tags 661109 patch
thanks
Whoops, sorry, forgot the patch. Here it is!
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.or
Hi Steve, and thanks for your bugreport,
Le 24.02.2012 10:05, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> Please find attached a patch for lsb that adds a new helper function to
> /lib/lsb/init-functions to support maintainer scripts that should behave as
> no-ops because the package is upstart-aware and upstart i
Hi Didier,
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 06:39:07PM +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> > I'm proposing this change in support of bug #591791, a bug against
> > debian-policy which aims to come up with coherent rules about the inclusion
> > of native upstart jobs in Debian. This is not a very high-lev
tags 661109 -moreinfo +pending
thanks
Le 01.05.2012 07:42, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> My opinion is that this is best done in the single /lib/lsb/init-functions
> file. The filename is an interface defined in the LSB, but there's nothing
> in the LSB that says this interface can't provide additio
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 09:45:44AM +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Le 01.05.2012 07:42, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> > My opinion is that this is best done in the single /lib/lsb/init-functions
> > file. The filename is an interface defined in the LSB, but there's nothing
> > in the LSB that sa
Le 02.05.2012 08:55, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> BTW, I'm sorry to say I've just noticed the patch I sent has a bug; the
> output of 'which initctl' should be suppressed, otherwise each init script
> using this function will output "/sbin/initctl" which we don't want.
>
> So the line should be:
>
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 09:35:34AM +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Le 02.05.2012 08:55, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> > BTW, I'm sorry to say I've just noticed the patch I sent has a bug; the
> > output of 'which initctl' should be suppressed, otherwise each init script
> > using this function wi
8 matches
Mail list logo
