On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 05:21:42PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
Control: reopen -1
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 13:33:50 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 2013-02-02 10:56, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 05:21:42PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
Control: reopen -1
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 13:33:50 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User:
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 11:08:27AM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
Upload to tpu done
unblock r-cran-genabel/1.7-0-3
Thanks for your patience
Andreas.
By the looks of it, the version you uploaded to testing-proposed-updates
has a higher version than the one in
On Sat, 2013-02-02 at 12:18 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 11:08:27AM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
By the looks of it, the version you uploaded to testing-proposed-updates
has a higher version than the one in sid.
That's correct. It would be pretty easy to increase the
Control: reopen -1
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 13:33:50 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package r-cran-genabel
The problem was fixed by backporting the solution from
Hi Julien,
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 05:21:42PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
unblock r-cran-genabel/1.7-0-2
It's unblocked, however it picked up a dependency on newer r-base than
is in testing, so it won't migrate. Probably means you'll need an
upload to tpu to get this fixed in wheezy.
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 18:48:03 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
Could you please be more verbose? I just builded the package in a
freshly created wheezy chroot. The dependency is r-base-core (=
2.15.1~) and wheezy has 2.15.1-4.
http://packages.debian.org/sid/r-cran-genabel
Not sure what more
On Fri, 2013-02-01 at 18:48 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 05:21:42PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
unblock r-cran-genabel/1.7-0-2
It's unblocked, however it picked up a dependency on newer r-base than
is in testing, so it won't migrate. Probably means you'll need
Hi Julien,
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 07:57:19PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 18:48:03 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
Could you please be more verbose? I just builded the package in a
freshly created wheezy chroot. The dependency is r-base-core (=
2.15.1~) and wheezy
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package r-cran-genabel
The problem was fixed by backporting the solution from upstream (see debdiff).
unblock r-cran-genabel/1.7-0-2
-- System Information:
Debian
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 13:33:50 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package r-cran-genabel
The problem was fixed by backporting the solution from upstream (see debdiff).
Hi Julien,
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 07:53:05PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 13:33:50 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package r-cran-genabel
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 21:04:25 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi Julien,
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 07:53:05PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 13:33:50 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 09:32:47PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
My analysis was wrong. It actually does access the network but *if* it
is able the build breaks (as well as the attempt to load the library in
R). I guess there are good chances that the build would have worked if
network
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 21:37:03 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 09:32:47PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
My analysis was wrong. It actually does access the network but *if* it
is able the build breaks (as well as the attempt to load the library in
R). I guess there
15 matches
Mail list logo