Bug#717636: latex-sanskrit package

2019-01-15 Thread Hilmar Preuße
reassign 717636 texlive-lang-other found 717636 2018.20181214-1 stop On 13.10.14 13:34, intrigeri wrote: > On current sid, with texlive-lang-indic installed: > > $ t1disasm > /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/sanskrit/sktb10.pfb | grep > start > dup 3 {systemdict /internaldict

Bug#717636: latex-sanskrit package

2014-10-13 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Vasudev Kamath wrote (02 Oct 2014 13:41:01 GMT) : > intrigeri writes: >> Isn't it a transitional package depending on the one that now ships >> the font? Isn't the font still affected by the problem this bug >> is about? > Nope! The source of that package is pre XeLaTeX and no longer maintai

Bug#717636: latex-sanskrit package

2014-10-13 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 5:04 PM, intrigeri wrote: > On current sid, with texlive-lang-indic installed: > > $ t1disasm > /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/sanskrit/sktb10.pfb | grep > start > dup 3 {systemdict /internaldict known not {pop 3} {1183615869 systemdict > /internaldict

Bug#717636: latex-sanskrit package

2014-09-30 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Vasudev Kamath wrote (14 Aug 2014 08:12:31 GMT) : > Its no longer part of Debian-IN team, now its transitional package part > of TexLive, thanks to Debian-Tex maintainers (Norbert specifically) [1] OK, fair enough. The RC bug (#717636) should probably be reassigned to the package that ships t

Bug#717636: latex-sanskrit package

2014-10-01 Thread Vasudev Kamath
intrigeri writes: > Hi, > > Vasudev Kamath wrote (14 Aug 2014 08:12:31 GMT) : >> Its no longer part of Debian-IN team, now its transitional package part >> of TexLive, thanks to Debian-Tex maintainers (Norbert specifically) [1] > > OK, fair enough. The RC bug (#717636) should probably be reassign

Bug#717636: latex-sanskrit package

2014-10-02 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Vasudev Kamath wrote (02 Oct 2014 05:23:48 GMT) : > Well probably bug should be closed, because the new package is just > transitional package and doesn't have any source in it which was the > reason for this bug report. Isn't it a transitional package depending on the one that now ships the

Bug#717636: latex-sanskrit package

2014-10-02 Thread Vasudev Kamath
intrigeri writes: > Hi, > > Vasudev Kamath wrote (02 Oct 2014 05:23:48 GMT) : >> Well probably bug should be closed, because the new package is just >> transitional package and doesn't have any source in it which was the >> reason for this bug report. > > Isn't it a transitional package depending

Bug#717636: latex-sanskrit package

2014-11-11 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Vasudev Kamath wrote (13 Oct 2014 11:51:51 GMT) : > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 5:04 PM, intrigeri wrote: >> On current sid, with texlive-lang-indic installed: >> >> $ t1disasm >> /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/sanskrit/sktb10.pfb | grep >> start >> dup 3 {systemdict /interna

Bug#717636: [Debian-in-workers] Bug#717636: latex-sanskrit package

2014-10-27 Thread Vasudev Kamath
Hi, Vasudev Kamath writes: > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 5:04 PM, intrigeri wrote: >> On current sid, with texlive-lang-indic installed: >> >> $ t1disasm >> /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/sanskrit/sktb10.pfb | grep >> start >> dup 3 {systemdict /internaldict known not {pop 3} {

Bug#717636: [latex-sanskrit] Package contain type1 startlock fragment from black book

2013-07-23 Thread Bastien ROUCARIÈS
Package: latex-sanskrit Version: 2.2-10 Severity: serious control: block -1 by 694308 Hi, You have overriden the lintian warning about the copyrighted fragment of adobe. After a double check they are some problem still t1disasm sktb10.pfb | grep start give some positive check from black book