Control: reassign 839218 nama
Control: retitle 839218 nama: FTBFS because of perl's lack of stack reference
counting
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 09:33:29AM +0200, Balint Reczey wrote:
> Control: tags -1 patch
>
> Hi Niko,
>
> On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 8:23 PM, Niko Tyni wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 24, 20
Control: tags -1 patch
Hi Niko,
On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 8:23 PM, Niko Tyni wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 11:30:11AM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:
>
>> I'll also work a bit on reducing the test further when I find the time.
>
> I got it down to this:
>
> my $a = [ 0, 1 ];
> sub f {
> my $arg
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 11:30:11AM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:
> I'll also work a bit on reducing the test further when I find the time.
I got it down to this:
my $a = [ 0, 1 ];
sub f {
my $arg = shift;
my @a1 = @$a;
@$a = @a1;
return();
}
map{ f($_) } @$a;
This looks to m
Control: forwarded -1 https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=131054
Control: tags -1 upstream
On 03/24/2017 10:30 AM, Niko Tyni wrote:
>> Should I forward it to Perl upstream?
> That would be nice, thanks. I'm sure they'd also prefer a minimal test case,
> but maybe the assert details are enou
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 03:51:45PM +0100, Balint Reczey wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 8:53 PM, Niko Tyni wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 04:05:43PM +0100, Balint Reczey wrote:
> >
> >> It looks like not all regression are fixed after the re-implementation
> >> and the one affecting nama is o
Hi Niko,
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 8:53 PM, Niko Tyni wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 04:05:43PM +0100, Balint Reczey wrote:
>
>> It looks like not all regression are fixed after the re-implementation
>> and the one affecting nama is one of them.
>
> Some effort on a reduced test case would have b
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 04:05:43PM +0100, Balint Reczey wrote:
> It looks like not all regression are fixed after the re-implementation
> and the one affecting nama is one of them.
Some effort on a reduced test case would have been appreciated; the nama
code base is rather big.
While I haven't m
Hi Gregor,
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 1:36 PM, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 13:31:32 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
>
>> > This looks like a problem in perl itself possibly causing random crashes
>> > elsewhere, too.
>> Does this problem also show up with 5.24.1-1 in testing and/or
>>
On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 13:31:32 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > This looks like a problem in perl itself possibly causing random crashes
> > elsewhere, too.
> Does this problem also show up with 5.24.1-1 in testing and/or
> 5.24.1-2 in unstable?
Looking at the upstream ticket at
https://rt.cpan.or
Control: retitle -1 Perl 5.24 makes nama FTBFS due to segfault
# or "Perl 5, version 24, ..."
On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 13:14:53 +0100, Balint Reczey wrote:
> Control: reassign -1 perl 5.24.0~rc3-1
> Control: affects -1 nama
> Control: retitle -1 perl: Perl 24 makes nama FTBFS due to segfault
> This l
Control: reassign -1 perl 5.24.0~rc3-1
Control: affects -1 nama
Control: retitle -1 perl: Perl 24 makes nama FTBFS due to segfault
Dear Perl Maintainers,
On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 10:09:01 +0100 Chris Lamb wrote:
> Source: nama
> Version: 1.208-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: fails to build fro
Source: nama
Version: 1.208-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
nama fails to build from source in unstable/amd64:
[..]
Sett
12 matches
Mail list logo