Edmund Grimley Evans writes:
> It looks like Emacs Lisp may be involved. Does Emacs Lisp use tagged
> pointers? Pointers have fairly recently become 48-bit on arm64, which
> has broken some other programs.
I believe it does, and I believe it (at least used to)
The Ubuntu bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/emacs25/+bug/1656474
Memory corruption reported on mailing list:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2017-03/msg00827.html
It looks like Emacs Lisp may be involved. Does Emacs Lisp use tagged
pointers? Pointers have fairly
Source: emacs25
Version: 25.2+1-2
Followup-For: Bug #868165
Hi!
If the optimization level has influence on the actual build failure,
this might be caused by a gcc bug. Did you try building with an
older, known-to-work version of gcc?
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian
Source: emacs25
Version: 25.2+1-2
Severity: serious
Hello, emacs25 seems to be FTBFS on arm64.
In Ubuntu we had mostly the same failure in the past months, and we
workarounded it by using -O0 on
that architecture.
Since Debian has porterboxes, a better debugging should be the best solution
4 matches
Mail list logo