reassign 610600 base-files
thanks
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 20:37:44 +0100, Ulrich Zehl wrote:
> Unconditionally adding a line to nsswitch.conf via the base-files package
> will work, because the non-LDAP sudo does not read it in any case.
Ok, thanks for commenting on this.
I'll reassign this to the
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 14:37:13 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> This postinst snippet:
>
> constitutes a violation of Policy 3.9.1 ("Package maintainer scripts may
> prompt the user if necessary. Prompting must be done by communicating
> through a program, such as `debconf', which conforms to the Debian
tags 605580 +fixed
thanks
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 15:13:13 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> The attached patch makes sudo's debian/rules respect the noopt and
> nostrip build options.
Thanks for the patch. Merged in my git repo for my next upload.
Bdale
pgpUGZ0qboKq0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, 27 Nov 2010 22:58:14 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Or wait, I wont. Removed control@ from to: on purpose, see below
>
> > I'm open to interesting suggestions (particularly if they come with
> > working patches), but the current situation was the best I could come up
> > with the last time
I vote B, A, SQ.
Bdale
pgpvhzJuPo4cr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
This kind of new user expanded verbosity seems better implemented somwhere
like in the shell so that it applies to all commands, not just to those
run through sudo.
Bdale
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact lis
Justin, this was indeed fixed as part of the response to #388659, but then
reverted because the problem stated earlier in the thread, that /usr/bin/vi
is not guaranteed to be present.
Bdale
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
On Fri, 03 Dec 2010 18:05:30 +0100, Alexander Kurtz
wrote:
> I think this is a security problem. Or am I missing something here?
Why do you think this is a security issue? If you put someone in group
sudo, you're giving them the keys to the kingdom. Changing the primary
group with sudo -g does
On Sat, 04 Dec 2010 01:19:29 -0500, Daniel Dickinson
wrote:
> The updated version hasn't made it to squeeze so this bug remains open
> there.
Yep, looks like I uploaded v3 bits to unstable too quickly, so the p2-2
upload never had time to get into testing. Will see what I can do about
that.
Bd
tags 603371 +upstream +sid
thanks
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 13:59:30 -0600, Martin Gallant wrote:
> The bug still exists in the latest version 1.25-2.
It appears to be known by tar upstream that you can't use
--one-file-system and --listed-incremental together, which is what
amanda is trying to do.
tags 602241 +help
thanks
On Tue, 02 Nov 2010 21:31:48 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> your package no longer builds on kfreebsd-*:
> | 38: extract over symlinks FAILED (extrac13.at:27)
Any idea what's different about a kfreebsd system that might cause this
to fail?
Bdale
pgp
On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 14:47:00 +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
tags 606176 +pending
thanks
> Running "openrocket blah.ork" doesn't work, but it does if you change
> the wrapper script:
Thanks, in my git for the next upload.
Bdale
pgp9ILkuwGksE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 14:10:26 -0500, "Pascal Giard, ing. jr, M.Ing."
wrote:
> any news on the matter?
I've done some more work on it, but I'm currently heads-down working on
something else and am not sure when I'll get a new set of packages
uploaded.
I personally consider all of the gnuradio bit
I just had to chase this down on one of my servers. The fact that the
recommends on geoip-database is indirect meant extra steps to investigate
and fix the problem.
So, the problem with not fixing this bug is that it breaks existing webalizer
installations on upgrade to squeeze. FWIW, that make
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 23:59:54 +0200, Julien Viard de Galbert
wrote:
> I see your point, so a direct recommends on geoip-database will give
> less steps to fixing the issue, however, a depends would install
> geoip-database even for users not enabling the geoip feature... and I
> still think thats
00:00:00 2001
From: Bdale Garbee
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 11:33:07 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] add a new --return option that pulls build results to current directory
---
cowpoke.conf |3 +++
scripts/cowpoke.1 |5 +
scripts/cowpoke.sh | 22 ++
3 files cha
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:40:58 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> I don't see a prior discussion before upload on debian-release@. Did I miss
> something?
No.
> The diff's a pain to review due to source v3[0]. As there's a patch series,
> why isn't it used?
I guess I'm just not that consistent about
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 23:00:15 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> I have uploaded the follow changes to delayed/7.
Thanks. I may or may not convert this to a maintainer upload once I
arrive at Debconf, but appreciate the help in either case!
Bdale
pgpT95YUHhfB1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
tags +292774 wontfix
thanks
On Thu, 05 Aug 2010 13:20:42 +0200, Witold Baryluk
wrote:
> i would also like to have this possiblity,
> to use bsdtar as tar provider. Currently
> it is impossible to use it by bsdtar, becuase
> tar should in first place provide alternative to tar.
It's much more co
Package: lintian
While the packaging manual section 3.7 suggests that Debian menu requires an
xpm format icon, that is not actually true. In all cases I've tried, a png
is just fine too. Several packages now deliver png icons that work fine with
both desktop and menu files.
Currently, lintian e
On Fri, 6 Aug 2010 18:13:17 +0200, Ralf Treinen
wrote:
> The common reason on all architectures seems to be
> that it depends (indirectly) on libboost-thread1.40.0 which only lives
> in testing but not in unstable. I guess that this dependency should be
> upgraded to libboost-python1.42.0.
Still
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 22:03:23 +0200, Arnold Metselaar
wrote:
> When amanda-common is built on a system with procps installed autoconf
> does the right thing with the variable $PS in Constants.pm:
Aha! Thanks for chasing this down. Build dep added in my git repo for
the next upload.
Bdale
pg
tags 523499 +pending
thanks
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 23:09:13 +0100, Philip Muskovac wrote:
> This bug was also reported on Launchpad against Ubuntu today:
The changes are now in my git repo waiting for the next upload.
Updating the Debian BTS to reflect that.
Bdale
pgphrUZSyDxVt.pgp
Description:
fixed 582057 1.7.2p6-1
thanks
On Tue, 18 May 2010 00:32:52 +0200, Moritz Naumann
wrote:
> Package: sudo
> Version: 1.6.9p17-2+lenny1
> Severity: important
>
> When invoking sudo with -u, passing an invalid (or valid but not
> matching/existing) UID value, it segfaults.
>
> r...@pepper:~# sudo
tags 582486 +pending
thanks
On Fri, 21 May 2010 09:54:15 +0200, Christian Meyer wrote:
> Is it neccessary to conflict with python-wxgtk2.6 when python-wxgtk2.8 is
> required anyway?
To be honest, I don't recall why the conflicts got added. I'll remove
it on the next upload.
Bdale
pgpQNXALKS0
On Sun, 23 May 2010 00:36:10 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> at this stage xz-utils is priority: required while lzma is deprecated.
> so tar should use unxz to decompress lzma archives.
It looks like I can just use the configure option --with-lzma=xz. Since
lzma upstream appears to recommend that
On Sun, 23 May 2010 16:52:54 +0200, Bill Allombert
wrote:
> On the other hand this would fix 523494 (and you can remove the
> Suggests: on lzma as well).
Ugh. I guess I missed 523494 when I closed 523499 on the 1.23-1
upload. I'm not sure what the point of duplicating that bug was, but no
matt
tags 573108 +pending
thanks
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 11:37:11 +1100, "Trent W. Buck" wrote:
> a description like ... will help me remember why this package exists.
Good point!
Since I don't personally admin anything LDAP-related, I have at best a
weak understanding of it myself... ;-)
I'll update
On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 22:23:32 +0100 (CET), Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn
wrote:
> | # sudo -i
> | sudo: /etc/sudoers.d/local is mode 0644, should be 0440
> | >>> /etc/sudoers.d/README: /etc/sudoers.d/local near line 18 <<<
> | sudo: parse error in /etc/sudoers.d/README near line 18
> | sudo: no valid s
On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 17:24:51 +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Package: tech-ctte
> Severity: normal
>
> Hello Technical Committee,
> we'd like you to decide about how the Python interpreter packages
> should be maintained in Debian.
Thank you for bringing this to the Committee's attention. However,
tags 552390 +moreinfo +unreproducible
thanks
I can't reproduce this error, so I'm not sure what to do about it. Do you
have any other information to offer?
Bdale
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas..
On Wed, 12 May 2010 23:21:13 +, ow...@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking
System) wrote:
> > reopen 581393
You assert that there is a policy violation where there is none, and
I've already explained how you can achieve a trivial resolution of the
behavior that bothers you with the existing p
On Thu, 13 May 2010 04:28:27 +0400, sergio wrote:
> On 05/13/2010 04:05 AM, Bdale Garbee wrote:
>
> > You assert that there is a policy violation where there is none, and
> > I've already explained how you can achieve a trivial resolution of the
> > behavior that
On Thu, 13 May 2010 00:25:10 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> This should work no matter whether bash or dash is used as /bin/sh:
So icky ... But thanks, I get it now.
Bdale
pgprwGy5wsgdA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, 14 May 2010 16:48:48 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Conflicts are not meant for this. Debian policy says no two programs
> with the same filename and different functionality are allowed, and the
> only possible resolutions are to rename one or both of the programs.
Wow. I don't recall p
On Fri, 14 May 2010 12:05:41 -0400, Erik Lattimore wrote:
>
> This bug is related to #565223, which is fixed upstream or there is a
> patch included in the ticket.
Thanks for pointing this out.
Bdale
pgpTpioOYfOgs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 17:24:51 +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Package: tech-ctte
> Severity: normal
>
> Hello Technical Committee,
> we'd like you to decide about how the Python interpreter packages
> should be maintained in Debian.
I've spent several hours since my last message communicating with th
On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 23:57:09 +0100, Jean-Christophe Dubacq
wrote:
Thanks for the questions on IRC yesterday, and for this but report.
After some sleep and re-reading some of my changelog entries, this isn't
quite as simple as it seemed yesterday.
> * I do not understand why /etc/sudoers is not
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 21:22:25 +0100, Jean-Christophe Dubacq
wrote:
> And in fact, I think the best solution would be to do what some
> databases do, and would correspond to what you aim to do with the other
> files: namely, preventing losing root access for people using sudo as
> sole root access
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:47:00 +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
wrote:
> > Texlive 2009 now supports Lithuanian language in a standard way
> > (texlive-lang source package builds texlive-lang-lithuanian) so
> > there is no need to use littex package.
>
> debian-history build-depends on littex, th
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:47:00 +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
wrote:
> debian-history build-depends on littex, that needs to be resolved before
> littext can be removed.
I just uploaded debian-history 2.11 which no longer build depends on
littex, so you are free to remove it now.
Bdale
pgpVSa
Package: libjcommon-java
Version: 1.0.10.dfsg-1
Severity: wishlist
I'm packaging openrocket, which includes a copy of jcommon-1.0.16 in its
source tree. When do you expect to upload a fresher version of the standalone
package?
Bdale
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists
tags 575151 +pending
thanks
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 21:57:35 +0100, j...@multani.info wrote:
> Package: openrocket
> Version: 1.0.0-1
> Severity: important
>
> After installing and running for the first time openrocket, I got the
> following traceback on the console:
Oops. It looks like some of the
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:34:48 +0100, Harald Dunkel
wrote:
> Package: sudo
> Version: 1.7.2p1-1.2
>
> I have installed a private sudoers file /etc/sudoers.d/tom.
> Sudo did not like the access permissions, and crashed.
> There was no crash after fixing the permissions as suggested.
I can't reprod
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 09:07:30 +0200, Ralf Gross
wrote:
> Package: sudo
> Version: 1.6.9p17-2+lenny1
Where did you get this version? It's not one of mine.
It's possible that one of the fixes for priv escalation holes found in those
older versions of sudo might be causing the problem. I'd love
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 17:11:40 +0200, Ralf Gross
wrote:
> Hm, this version is not available on out local mirror yet. Instead I tried
> 1.7.2p5-1 from sid, which could be installed without problem on lenny.
>
> The problem seems to be solved with this version:
Cool!
> What does this mean for the
On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 11:38:11 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Personally, I don't think runit-run's behavior here is what's intended to be
> allowed under Policy.
I agree. The current behavior in the case where the question is
answered "yes" seems completely inadequate, and the mere presence of th
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 10:55:47 +0200, "Andreas B. Mundt"
wrote:
> when installing a ltsp-server in debian-edu, the installation fails
> because sudo is removed and no root password set. This is caused by
> sudo.prerm which checks whether the root account is locked.
>
> Unfortunately this happens
On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 20:01 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> It would be better to solve that problem (that the
> administrator should be able to choose whether to run the daemon) with
> a debconf question.
I agree. Either a debconf question, or a default behavior of using
sysvinit in the main package
On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 11:16 -0700, Glenn English wrote:
> Package: amanda-server
> Version: 1:2.5.2p1-4
> Severity: normal
> File: amanda
>
>
> User backup's home dir (/var/backup) isn't writable by backup.
The amanda-common postinst creates the backup user, creates the home
directory if it does
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 18:20 +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> just as an exercise what might be done to fix this:
> It would seem that the options are
> - not fix it (for now),
> - find something in current tar that works (I didn't),
> - switch off tar,
> - try to do something with tar
> (new upst
tags 512993 +pending
thanks
On Sun, 2009-01-25 at 17:10 +0100, Fernando González de Requena wrote:
> Please find attached the spanish debconf template translation, proofread
> by the debian-l10n-spanish mailing list contributors.
Thank you! This is now in my local revision control system and wil
severity 511651 important
thanks
On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 03:31 +0100, Zlatko Calusic wrote:
> Package: dump
> Version: 0.4b41-6
> Severity: grave
> Justification: causes non-serious data loss
>
> I've just noticed that dumps that I've been doing last few weeks are
> completely unusable. And the rea
tags 168606 +pending
thanks
On Sat, 2009-01-24 at 02:27 +1100, Carl Worth wrote:
> Here's a patch that allows the "-f -" option to work with zgrep in the
> same way that it works with grep.
Thanks, Carl!
Bdale
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a sub
tags 513754 +wontfix
thanks
The lack of 'type' support in posh feels more like a bug to me than a feature.
I'm not likely to work on this bug until #397601 is resolved, hopefully by
someone pursuing the proposal to get 'type' added to the set of features
expected to be supported by a shell in De
Hi Alexander.
Do you have any update on your ITP of connman? I want to use it for a project
I'm working on, and the bits at git.moblin.org seem reasonable to package. If
you're still interested, that's great, but if not please let me know and
perhaps I'll take a stab at it.
Bdale
--
To UNS
Hi Marco!
Any update on when we can expect a fresher udev build in unstable? The lack
of libudev is blocking several interesting tools from being packaged for
Debian.
I note that Scott Remnant appears to have done a lot of work on on upstream
version 136 which is now in Ubuntu, I haven't rea
On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 16:01 +, Adrian Bridgett wrote:
> Just a quick chase on this - it's almost there, just a typo to fix in
> the package. It'd be great if this could make it into lenny.
It might be possible for this to be petitioned in to a lenny point
release. Exactly what the criteria f
Package: cups
Version: 1.3.9-15
Ok, with foomatic v4 now in the archive and this version of cups pulling it
in, #511009 is indeed fixed. That's great. Unfortunately, something else
is now broken.
If I take a simple ASCII text file and send it to any of my printers using
lpr, it comes out in a f
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 16:29 +0100, Ralph Rößner wrote:
> Bumping this request to Amanda version 2.6.1 . Having the pre- and
> post-script features would be really helpful.
Working on it already.
Bdale
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "uns
severity 511009 serious
thanks
I'm seeing this problem now.
All of my printers started spewing pages of raw pdf when I upgraded to
cups 1.3.9-14 yesterday from whatever was in unstable as of a week or so
ago. All of them are HP devices using hplip and network interfaces.
The problem apparently
Hi Chris!
I raised the severity on cups bug #511009 yesterday to release-critical,
since the move from postscript to pdf as the default cups output format
broke all of my printers.
As Keith Packard noted in a follow-up to the bug, it appears that
foomatic 4.0 adds support for pdf input. So, upda
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 00:48 -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> Is there a use case for having people in the group staff with
> /usr/local g+w that isn't better solved using sudo to provide similar
> access? [I've never had people in the staff group, so I don't know
> what people were using it for histo
On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 21:39 -0600, Astrild wrote:
> Package: sudo
> Version: 1.6.9p17-2
> Followup-For: Bug #198991
>
>
> ok, this is quite simple, make sudo to always default to targetpw
> Not much to explain, there was a little bug in Suse with kdesu and when they
> tried to solve it, they fac
severity 518493 wishlist
reassign 518493 debian-installer
thanks
On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 16:27 +0100, andso wrote:
> Package: sudo
> Version: 1.6.9p17-1
> Severity: normal
> File: sudoers
>
> with debian-xfce i cant use directly sudo because i(user)'m not in sudoers
> file,
> after fresh install.
severity 506122 serious
thanks
Increasing the severity on this to ensure the package isn't released stable
with this bug still present.
Blindly breaking postfix+postgrey integration clearly meets the 'makes the
package unsuitable for release' criteria for severity serious.
Bdale
--
To UN
On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 16:37 -0500, sasha mal wrote:
> Package: makedev
> Version: 2.3.1-88
> Severity: critical
>
> During and after an update from etch to lenny, installation procedure
> for packages that need creating devices cannot create them.
Why is /dev/.static/dev/ read-only on your syste
Package: git-buildpackage
Severity: wishlist
By default, I have my .gbp.conf file set up to use pristine-tar. However,
when dealing with a non-DFSG upstream tarball, it would be nice to be able
to do something like:
git-buildpackage --no-pristine-tar -S
pristine-tar commit ../bui
On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 16:03 +0200, Fladischer Michael wrote:
> Running `strace` shows that sudo does not open any of this configuration
> files despite '/etc/sudoers'.
Can you forward me the strace output, please? I don't personally use
LDAP, so I don't have a quick way to try and reproduce the
On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 14:32 +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
> Package: makedev
> Version: 2.3.1-88
> Severity: important
>
> As far I see, it is very hard to use debian these days without udev,
> so makedev has become outdated. If makedev is not to be removed
> yet, it should at least not be Priority: r
On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 20:51 +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:12:39AM -0600, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> > One is the use of makedev in package postinst scripts. I don't know
> > offhand what the set of packages are that have an implicit dependency on
> >
On Sat, 2009-04-04 at 21:03 +0200, David Paleino wrote:
> > processing
> > /var/cache/debtorrent/ftp.pl.debian.org_debian_dists_unstable_main_binary-all/pool/main/b/bash-completion/bash-completion_1.0-1_all.deb
> > (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/etc/bash_completion.d/mtx', which is also
> > in
On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 16:07 +0200, Jari Aalto wrote:
> Package: gzip
> Version: 1.3.12-7
> Severity: important
Hi. Thanks for the problem report. What causes you to flag this
problem as being of severity 'important'? It's not immediately obvious
to me that this should be anything other than 'no
severity 473228 +wishlist
thanks
On Sat, 2008-03-29 at 14:46 +0200, Jari Aalto wrote:
> Package: tar
> Version: 1.19-3
> Severity: normal
> Page http://www.gnu.org/software/tar/ lists options for 1.19:
>
> * New option --exclude-vcs excludes directories and files, created
> by several
On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 14:42 -0400, Tony Lill wrote:
> Here is my /etc/fstab
>
> /dev/md5/ ext3noatime,errors=remount-ro 0 1
>
> Here's the output of mount:
>
> /dev/md5 on / type ext3 (rw,noatime,errors=remount-ro)
>
> Here's the entry from my disklist file:
>
> ds
On Wed, 2008-03-12 at 15:36 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Feb 2008, Bdale Garbee wrote:
>
> > It would be very interesting to me to know if the performance of tar is
> > still
> > a problem for you in version 1.19-1 and later. Is this something you could
&g
severity 470202 important
tags 470202 +moreinfo +unreproducible
thanks
Hello Raphael. Sorry you're having trouble with amanda. I don't see the
problem here, so suspect there might be something unusual in your config
files. Can you send me a copy of them to look over?
Bdale
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 21:59:03 -0800, Paul Eggert wrote:
> This file name is exactly 100 bytes long, and if I recall, that used
> to be a problem area in GNU tar. The 1.24 tarball contains a longlink
> representation of the file (which isn't right), whereas the 1.23 tarball
> is right.
Ugh. Smoki
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 22:19:12 -0800, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 11/10/2010 10:14 PM, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 21:59:03 -0800, Paul Eggert wrote:
> >> This file name is exactly 100 bytes long, and if I recall, that used
> >> to be a problem area in
Package: eagle
Severity: wishlist
Eagle version 5.11 is now available, and every time you launch 5.10 it tells
you that. Be nice to have updated packages.
Bdale
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@
On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:10:42 +0200, Lars Gustäbel wrote:
> I browsed through the history and found out that this patch was
> introduced back in 2004 to work around some problems in dpkg (bug
> #230910). dpkg was fixed four weeks later (bug #232025), but the patch
> has not been reverted up to this
On Fri, 1 Oct 2010 09:12:31 +0200, Diggory Hardy
wrote:
> For me, then, turning tty_tickets off is a good enough solution. I'll try to
> add a note into the fish users wiki.
Feed me a suitable paragraph and I'll be happy to add it to the sudo
README.Debian file.
Bdale
pgpZtkLfWFTWx.pgp
Descr
On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 22:15:43 -0200, Teresa e Junior
wrote:
> Since we upgraded from sudo 1.7.2 to 1.7.4, webmin is broken.
I know nothing useful about webmin.
Can you use sudo from the command line as the affected user ok? In
other words, I'm trying to understand if the problem is that sudo ju
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:00:20 +0200, Yellowprotoss
wrote:
> $ sudo ircp "/tmp/tm.txt"
> Connecting...failed
>
> during sending a regular file (readable)
I don't know anything about ircp, so this doesn't tell me anything about
what you expected to happen that didn't happen. It looks like sudo is
retitle 560766 "ITP: heekscad -- Free CAD based on Open CASCADE"
retitle 561002 "ITP: heekscnc -- CNC machining add-in for HeeksCAD"
thanks
I'm using these two now for my own purposes, and will do the extra work
to upload policy-compliant packages. The only issue I see so far is
that add-ins like
On Tue, 11 Jan 2011 21:41:48 -0600, Joe Neal wrote:
> Package: sudo
> Version: 1.7.4p4-6
> Severity: important
>
> Upon uncommenting the the new line in sudoers to include files in
> /etc/sudoers.d, visudo gives a syntax error warning on exit.
What do you mean "uncommenting"? The line is acti
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 22:38:56 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package sudo. It fixes CVE-2011-0010.
>
> unblock sudo/1.7.4p4-6
>
> There are some non-security f
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 14:37:47 -0500, Stew Benedict
wrote:
> The version of pax shipped with Debian and Ubuntu does not seem to
> populate the devmajor/devminor fields according to the ustar format.
The pax in Debian is built from sources acquired from the OpenBSD
project. For many years, we used
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010 13:16:06 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> As discussed with cworth on IRC yesterday, I've prepared an NMU for tar
> (versioned as 1.24-1.1) which I will upload directly to sid (assuming my
> smoke-testing is successful), to try to avoid packages intended for squeeze
> mis-building
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
The makedev 3.3.8.2 version in experimental is a developmental dead-end, and
I intend to do no further work on it. Please remove it from the archive.
Bdale
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsu
reassign 592376 gnome-panel
thanks
On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 13:24:43 -0400, tony wrote:
> Package: sudo
> Version: 1.7.2p7-1
> Severity: normal
>
> After installing squeeze and setting it up with sudo (using blank root
> password) the places menu doesn't allow access to remote filesystems. It
> prom
On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 16:55:25 -0400, Matthew Gabeler-Lee
wrote:
> tag 599376 upstream
> forwarded 599376 http://www.gratisoft.us/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=445
> thanks
>
> Issue is in upstream, upstream has a patch for it. Patch applies to Debian
> source cleanly and fixes the issue for me.
Tha
tags 598141 + unreproducible moreinfo
thanks
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 22:03:02 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Package: sudo
> Version: 1.7.4p4-3
> $ sudo -g staff id
> Segmentation fault
I can't reproduce this. Any other clues?
Bdale
pgpBWnA4NswQg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 14:45:35 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Some pod markup leaked to the sudoers manpage verbatim:
>
> $ man sudoers | grep -F 'F<'
>
> F
Looks like there's code in sudoers.man.pl which is called during the pod
to man conversion to try and fix up things like th
reassign 368297 libldap-2.4-2
thanks
I'm reassigning this but to libldap-2.4-2 since it now appears that the
problem isn't actually in sudo, but in the interaction between libldap,
gnutls, and gcrypt.
Bdale
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
On Fri, 8 Oct 2010 12:26:24 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Have you tried with the minimal /etc/sudoers I attached to the first
> message?
No, good point. I'll try again when I have some more time to pursue this.
Bdale
pgpx2Ld3G1J0m.pgp
Description: PGP signature
reassign 594377 libpam-modules
thanks
Since the issue really seems to be undocumented defaults in pam_limits,
I'm reassigning this bug for resolution there.
Bdale
pgpgc6jIAJWVl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 13:10:47 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> We definitely need to get rid of the mess of different helpers in Squeeze+1
> without waiting until a month before the freeze. The reason that there are two
> helpers is insane enough and it is about time to fix that.
I agree.
As a cas
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 15:46:47 -0400, Pascal Giard wrote:
> Package: gnuradio
> Version: 3.2.2.dfsg-1
> Severity: normal
>
> Python 2.6 is now the default while python modules for GNURadio are only
> built/installed for python 2.5.
Thanks. I'm working a toolchain problem in the regression suite w
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 23:42:00 +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer
wrote:
> The FHS in turn specifies:
> "The following files, or symbolic links to files, must be in /sbin if the
> corresponding subsystem is installed:
> ...
> fsck.*
> mkfs.*
> "
> (see http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#SPE
901 - 1000 of 1120 matches
Mail list logo
