Package: libsoap-lite-perl
Version: 0.712-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Using the (slightly modified) examples at:
http://guide.soaplite.com/
causes the client to die with:
Not a HASH reference at /usr/share/perl5/SOAP/Lite.pm line 3755.
Sample code (Server)
===
Your message dated Mon, 01 Nov 2010 03:17:23 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#601995: fixed in sunflow 0.07.2.svn396+dfsg-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #601995,
regarding sunflow: file conflict when upgrading from lenny
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Your message dated Sun, 31 Oct 2010 22:17:18 -0500
with message-id <20101101031718.ga29...@burratino>
and subject line Re: dash: Can't open read-only scripts
has caused the Debian Bug report #586736,
regarding [dash] Cannot start system wide scripts
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sun, 31 Oct 2010 22:17:18 -0500
with message-id <20101101031718.ga29...@burratino>
and subject line Re: dash: Can't open read-only scripts
has caused the Debian Bug report #586736,
regarding dash: Dash prevents system from booting
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sun, 31 Oct 2010 22:17:18 -0500
with message-id <20101101031718.ga29...@burratino>
and subject line Re: dash: Can't open read-only scripts
has caused the Debian Bug report #586736,
regarding dash: Dash is unable to execute read only scripts
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Sun, 31 Oct 2010 22:17:18 -0500
with message-id <20101101031718.ga29...@burratino>
and subject line Re: dash: Can't open read-only scripts
has caused the Debian Bug report #586736,
regarding dash: Can't open read-only scripts
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 602052 serious
Bug #602052 [powernowd] Drop obsolete package
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
> subscribe 602052 mic...@ubuntu.com
There is no Debian Bug mailing list. If you wish to review bug reports
please do so via http://www
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 600916 + moreinfo
Bug #600916 [kdevelop] kdevelop: Kdevelop 4.01 crashes on open project or new
"simple cmake c++"
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
600916: http://bugs.d
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unmerge 538822
Bug#538822: dash: fails to install overwriting files from bash
Bug#540512: dash upgrade breaks mksh-as-/bin/sh
Disconnected #538822 from all other report(s).
> retitle 538822 dash fails to upgrade if /bin/sh is locally diverted
Bug
unmerge 538822
retitle 538822 dash fails to upgrade if /bin/sh is locally diverted
quit
Hi,
Axel Beckert wrote:
> 20/0/0 r...@acromantula:pts/3 23:05:57 [~] # dpkg-reconfigure dash
> Removing 'diversion of /bin/sh to /bin/sh.distrib by dash'
> Adding 'diversion of /bin/sh to /bin/sh.distrib by b
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 601805 + pending
Bug #601805 [viewvc] viewvc: Grave python errors which can be fixed with a one
liner, already upstream
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
601805: http://bu
tags 601805 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for viewvc (versioned as 1.1.5-1.1) and
I will upload it to DELAYED/10. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Ana
diff -u viewvc-1.1.5/debian/changelog viewvc-1.1.5/debian/changelog
--- viewvc-1.1.5/debian/chan
Hi Gerrit,
Ken Bloom wrote:
> I can report on the broken scenario, since I made this change just a
> few days ago to have dash provide /bin/sh on its own.
>
> The following instructions are given in
> /usr/share/doc/bash/README.Debian.gz for making /bin/sh point to
> something else.
>
>Type
Il giorno dom, 31/10/2010 alle 21.01 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff ha
scritto:
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 09:57:50AM +0200, Pietro Battiston wrote:
> > I wrote Soren 8 days ago informing him that I could take of that.
> >
> > I'll soon submit a patch.
>
> What's the status?
That I'll soon submit a pa
On 31/10/10 at 15:08 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 12:32:32PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Package: science-linguistics
> > Version: 0.11
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > See (bottom of) the log below.
> >
> > I'm not filing bugs for other blends packages, but the followi
Package: monodevelop-nunit
Version: 2.4+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Installing the package in a lenny chroot, then upgrading to squeeze, causes:
Unpacking libmono-cil-dev (from .../libmono-cil-dev_2.6.7-3_all.deb) ...
Replacing files in old package libmono-dev ...
dpkg: error processing
/v
On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 01:18:10PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> reopen 599515
> thanks
>
> Am Freitag 08 Oktober 2010 12:48:15 schrieb LaMont Jones:
> > On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 12:30:03PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > > Package: bind9
> > > Severity: grave
> > > Tags: security
> > > Ju
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 09:57:50AM +0200, Pietro Battiston wrote:
> I wrote Soren 8 days ago informing him that I could take of that.
>
> I'll soon submit a patch.
What's the status?
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 06:01:27PM -0500, Julián Moreno Patiño wrote:
The previous patch does not fix this bug completely .
Complete patch to fix CVE-2010-2055 attached.
Hi Julián and others,
I now completed packaging a new upstream release of ghostscript targeted
experimental - it is curren
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 07:52:19PM +0300, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
I'm also able to reproduce this bug. It occurs whenever using a program
that passes PDF directly to CUPS for printing. I tried to get some more
information, and ran pdftoraster manually as follows:
$ /usr/lib/cups/filter/pdftora
Subject:
Package: e16
Severity: normal
I wrongly decided to trust this upgrade to version 1.0.0-4, but it resulted
in
a bigger mess than the last nmu upload. Last time I just downgraded to ver.
1.0.0-3
and everything was back to where it was. This time, first I checked the
/etc/e16 folder
after up
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 602006 minor
Bug #602006 [gozerbot] gozerbot: build-depends on python 2.5
Severity set to 'minor' from 'serious'
> Okay adam lowering the severity
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> and yes debian has python 2.5 sorry
severity 602006 minor
Okay adam lowering the severity
and yes debian has python 2.5 sorry for the oversight
regards
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 11:23 PM, Adam D. Barratt
wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 23:04 +0530, Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
>> your package seem to depend on python 2.5
>
> Which isn'
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 08:58:46AM +0200, rpnpif wrote:
> Open
> http://media.eduscol.education.fr/file/seminaire_STI2D/56/7/STI2D_BacSTI2D_157567.odp
> Export in PDF/A-1a.
> The message "export to PDF" is displaying in status bar and OOo freezes with
> an high
> CPU activity.
> After some m
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 23:04 +0530, Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
> your package seem to depend on python 2.5
Which isn't a problem, as Debian has 2.5.
> and causes ftbfs on ubuntu
>
> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gozerbot/0.9.1.3-5/+build/2000202
Have you verified whether the package has any
Package: gozerbot
Version: 0.9.1.3-5
Severity: serious
Justification: fails-to-build-from-source
Hello dear maintainer
your package seem to depend on python 2.5 and causes ftbfs on ubuntu
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gozerbot/0.9.1.3-5/+build/2000202
and it also depends on python-all-de
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 601962 important
Bug #601962 [linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64] linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: removal
fails in a clean chroot
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistanc
severity 601962 important
thanks
On 31/10/10 at 15:58 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 12:46:55 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> > Removing linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64 in a clean chroot fails:
> > # apt-get remove --purge linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64
> > Reading package lists..
Am 2010-10-31 13:56, schrieb Robert Millan:
So you want me to cherry-pick this non-trivial patch but nobody has
tested it with mdraid 0.9, which I presume is the most widely deployed
version?
just for testing purposes i set up a 0.9 array on my machine:
r...@sow:~# cat /proc/mdstat
Personaliti
Package: uim-applet-gnome
Version: 1:1.5.7-9+b1
Severity: serious
Installing the package in a lenny chroot, then upgrading to squeeze,
causes:
Preparing to replace uim-gtk2.0 1:1.5.3-1 (using
.../uim-gtk2.0_1%3a1.5.7-9+b1_amd64.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement uim-gtk2.0 ...
dpkg: error pr
Package: sunflow
Version: 0.07.2.svn396+dfsg-5
Severity: serious
Installing the package in a lenny chroot, then upgrading to squeeze,
causes:
Unpacking libsunflow-java (from
.../libsunflow-java_0.07.2.svn396+dfsg-5_all.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/libsunflow-java
Package: libvtk5-qt4-dev
Version: 5.4.2-7+b2
Severity: serious
Installing the package in a lenny chroot, then upgrading to squeeze,
causes:
Preparing to replace libvtk5-qt4-dev 5.0.4-1.1 (using
.../libvtk5-qt4-dev_5.4.2-7+b2_amd64.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement libvtk5-qt4-dev ...
dpkg:
Package: librpm-dev
Version: 4.8.1-5
Severity: serious
Installing the package in a lenny chroot, then upgrading to squeeze,
causes:
Preparing to replace librpm-dev 4.4.2.3-1 (using
.../librpm-dev_4.8.1-5_amd64.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement librpm-dev ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cach
Package: libvtk5-qt3-dev
Version: 5.4.2-7+b2
Severity: serious
Installing the package in a lenny chroot, then upgrading to squeeze,
causes:
Preparing to replace libvtk5-qt3-dev 5.0.4-1.1 (using
.../libvtk5-qt3-dev_5.4.2-7+b2_amd64.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement libvtk5-qt3-dev ...
dpkg:
Package: zorp
Version: 3.3.6-1
Severity: serious
Installing the package in a lenny chroot, then upgrading to squeeze,
causes:
Unpacking libzorp0 (from .../libzorp0_3.3.6-1_amd64.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libzorp0_3.3.6-1_amd64.deb
(--unpack):
trying to ove
Package: libqdbm3++c2
Version: 1.8.77-3.1
Severity: serious
Installing the package in a lenny chroot, then upgrading to squeeze,
causes:
Unpacking libxqdbm3c2 (from .../libxqdbm3c2_1.8.77-3.1_amd64.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/libxqdbm3c2_1.8.77-3.1_amd64.deb (--u
Package: libvanessa-adt-dev
Version: 0.0.9-1
Severity: serious
Installing the package in a lenny chroot, then upgrading to squeeze,
causes:
Preparing to replace libvanessa-logger-dev 0.0.7-2 (using
.../libvanessa-logger-dev_0.0.10-1_amd64.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement libvanessa-logger-dev
Package: xfsdump
Version: 3.0.4
Severity: serious
Installing the package in a lenny chroot, then upgrading to squeeze,
causes:
dpkg: considering deconfiguration of xfsdump, which would be broken by
installation of xfsprogs ...
dpkg: yes, will deconfigure xfsdump (broken by xfsprogs).
Pre
So as already discussed offline, the best would be to drop -y from the
aptitude install invocation. If there are unmet dependencies, aptitude would
prompt for a confirmation, in which case tasksel could just relay the question
to the user.
-S
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@
Your message dated Sun, 31 Oct 2010 16:17:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#595396: fixed in slepc 3.0.0-p7.dfsg-7.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #595396,
regarding libslepc3.0.0: empty package
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 531978 - pending
Bug #531978 [libgphoto2] libgphoto2: Please modernize udev rules
Bug #564540 [libgphoto2] gvfs-backends: Canon camera not auto mounted by
gphoto2 backend, manually accessing gphoto2://[usb:id] works though
Bug #589220 [libgph
This package is now empty on most architectures, probably due to a bug
in the build rules provided by petsc. For some reason the shared
library is created as libslepc.so and not as libslepc.so.3.0.0. This is
masked by the way debian/rules is written, which ignores failures in
many commands. I'm
Well, it's not the right place for a rant, but this software and it's
build system are not exactly something I'd like to spend more time on.
Good luck
--
Enrico Tassi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 601961 normal
Bug #601961 [apt] apt: wrongly thinks install-info is essential
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
601961: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bi
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 12:46:55 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Removing linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64 in a clean chroot fails:
> # apt-get remove --purge linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> The following p
Package: dovecot-dev
Version: 1:1.2.15-1
Severity: serious
Installing dovecot-dev in a lenny chroot, then upgrading to squeeze, causes:
Preparing to replace dovecot-dev 1:1.0.15-2.3+lenny1 (using .../dovecot-dev_1%3
a1.2.15-1_amd64.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement dovecot-dev ...
dpkg: error p
> ta...@birba:~/work-area/BSP/atlas-3.8.3/debian$ cat libatlas-test.install
> usr/lib/libatlas-test/x*
no, this did not help. The binaries that used to be part of the -test
package are not even compiled now.
Still investigating.
--
Enrico Tassi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-r
Package: libcherokee-server0-dev
Version: 1.0.8-1
Severity: serious
Installing libcherokee-server0-dev in a lenny chroot, then upgrading to
squeeze, causes:
Preparing to replace libcherokee-server0-dev 0.7.2-4 (using
.../libcherokee-server0-dev_1.0.8-1_amd64.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement l
Package: gbonds
Version: 2.0.3-2
Severity: serious
Installing gbonds in a lenny chroot, then upgrading to squeeze, causes:
Selecting previously deselected package gbonds-data.
Unpacking gbonds-data (from .../gbonds-data_2.0.3-2_all.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/g
Package: cyrus-sasl2-heimdal-dbg
Version: 2.1.23.dfsg1-6
Severity: serious
Hi,
Installing cyrus-sasl2-heimdal-dbg in a lenny chroot, then upgrading to
squeeze, causes:
Preparing to replace cyrus-sasl2-heimdal-dbg 2.1.22.dfsg1-23+lenny1 (using
.../cyrus-sasl2-heimdal-dbg_2.1.23.dfsg1-6_amd64.deb)
On 31/10/10 at 14:16 +0100, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> Hi Lucas,
>
> On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 12:40, Lucas Nussbaum
> wrote:
> > apt won't let me remove install-info, because it thinks that it is
> > essential.
> >
> > grep depends on dpkg (>= 1.15.4) | install-info
> > my dpkg is 1.15.8.5
> > s
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 12:32:32PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Package: science-linguistics
> Version: 0.11
> Severity: serious
>
> See (bottom of) the log below.
>
> I'm not filing bugs for other blends packages, but the following ones
> are affected as well:
>
> ...
> Selecting previously
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Am 31.10.2010 um 12.42 schrieb Christian PERRIER:
> Just found this bug and package waiting to be uploaded to fix it.
>
> May I help or is your "usual sponsor" about to make the upload?
I did a successful upload on May 7th...
- ---snip---
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 600997 1.44c-3
Bug #600997 {Done: Charles Plessy } [imagej] imagej: cannot
quit imagej when an image was changed
Bug Marked as fixed in versions imagej/1.44c-3.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assi
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 02:14:10PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 12:52:22PM +0100, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> > With Aptitude::ProblemResolver::Remove-Level=maximum, the picture is very
> > different:
> > 0 packages upgraded, 375 newly installed, 0 to remove and 21 not
Hi Lucas,
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 12:40, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> apt won't let me remove install-info, because it thinks that it is
> essential.
>
> grep depends on dpkg (>= 1.15.4) | install-info
> my dpkg is 1.15.8.5
> so I should be allowed to remove install-info without that:
>
> WARNING: The
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 12:52:22PM +0100, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> With Aptitude::ProblemResolver::Remove-Level=maximum, the picture is very
> different:
> 0 packages upgraded, 375 newly installed, 0 to remove and 21 not upgraded.
> As I wrote already, I see this as defeating the point of ta
2010/10/30 Vincent Danjean :
> You should apply it to the grub2 package and upload it to unstable.
> It is sure that some regression will be fixed. And, perhaps, other
> regressions will occur. But there is currently no current indication of
> that and, as with this regression, they would have to
[Enrico Tassi, 2010-10-31]
> Could you help me in identifying the problem so that I can propose a
> reasonable patch for squeeze?
Griffith 0.11 was written using SQLAlchemy 0.5.X and Squeeze has 0.6.X.
I (with my python-sqlalchemy's maintainer hat on), was prodding other
maintainers to switch to 0
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 594171 unreproducible
Bug #594171 [libnunit2.4-cil] libnunit2.4-cil: nunit-console and nunit-gui fail
to load
Added tag(s) unreproducible.
> severity 594171 normal
Bug #594171 [libnunit2.4-cil] libnunit2.4-cil: nunit-console and nunit-gui fa
Hello,
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 11:38:39AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>
> I suppose these issues reported here refer to the horde3
> source package:
> http://lists.horde.org/archives/announce/2010/000568.html
Sorry for the delay and thanks for your upload of gollem and dimp1.
For horde3, I
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 11:52:39AM +0100, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I see two approaches here. Run aptitude in simulation mode, parse the output,
> and ask for user confirmation if any removals are required.
>
> Alternatively, tweak aptitude to not install any packages that require
> re
Hi Piotr, while I share with you the disappointment for a non properly
announced freeze date, I want Debian to succeed in making a nice
release.
I gave a look to the diff, to see if it was possible to backport a
minimal patch fixing this issue in squeeze. Unfortunately the diff from
0.11 and 0.12
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64
Version: 2.6.32-26
Severity: serious
Hi,
Removing linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64 in a clean chroot fails:
# apt-get remove --purge linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The followi
Just found this bug and package waiting to be uploaded to fix it.
May I help or is your "usual sponsor" about to make the upload?
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: apt
Version: 0.8.6
Severity: serious
Hi,
apt won't let me remove install-info, because it thinks that it is
essential.
grep depends on dpkg (>= 1.15.4) | install-info
my dpkg is 1.15.8.5
so I should be allowed to remove install-info without that:
$ sudo apt-get remove --purge install-in
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 592546 normal
Bug #592546 [kernel-package] kernel-package: does not create bootable image
Severity set to 'normal' from 'critical'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
592546: http://bugs.debi
severity 592546 normal
thanks
I'm lowering the severity of this bug report.
First of all I'm not sure if there actually is any bug; but even if
there is one it doesn't "break the system" (although I also don't
like to have kernel/boot problems :))
(For tuning the configration,
/usr/share/kernel-p
It seems that the package moved from the ancient dh_movefiles to the
"new" dh_install helper. Nevertheless the old libatlas-test.files was
dropped and no libatlas-test.install is provided.
I'm currently trying to recompile the package with the following
addition.
ta...@birba:~/work-area/BSP/a
Package: dropbox
Version: 0.8.107-1
Severity: normal
Sorry, but for me dropbox still presents this bug. The "reinstall-dropbox-
after-a-reboot" workaround works, but it is really uncomfortable.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing-proposed-updates
APT poli
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> merge 601953 601924
Bug#601924: dumpet: FTBFS: missing build-dep on pkg-config precludes finding
libxml2 headers
Bug#601953: dumpet: FTBFS, looks like missing pkg-config
Merged 601924 601953.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me
Hi,
I see two approaches here. Run aptitude in simulation mode, parse the output,
and ask for user confirmation if any removals are required.
Alternatively, tweak aptitude to not install any packages that require
removals. I don't know or use aptitude but from the little I've looked into
the manu
Package: src:dumpet
Version: 2.1-1
Severity: serious
Your package FTBFS on most architectures [0]. Here is a snippter from
amd64[1]:
| dh_auto_build
|make[1]: pkg-config: Command not found
|make[1]: Entering directory
`/build/buildd-dumpet_2.1-1-amd64-DZNRan/dumpet-2.1'
|make[1]: pkg-config: C
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 601817 + patch
Bug #601817 {Done: Anibal Monsalve Salazar } [gparted]
gparted crashes applying move to right of more than one logical partition
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
tag 601817 + patch
thanks
Upstream bug-report shows that this bug was fixed by a
single git commit, that could be cherry-picked for squeeze:
http://git.gnome.org/browse/gparted/commit/?id=7c0e3fa7789f413e8408e89ff7470e8ff86e7e72
As I think the Release Team wouldn't be happy too happy with a new
u
Wouah! That was quick! I'll request the sync to keep Ubuntu and Debian in sync.
Thanks !
Fabrice
2010/10/31, Debian Bug Tracking System :
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> which was filed against the cil package:
>
> #601935: cil FTBFS with missing cil command
>
> It
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 601818 0.6.2-1
Bug #601818 {Done: Anibal Monsalve Salazar } [gparted]
gparted crashes at start: glibmm-ERROR **
Bug No longer marked as found in versions gparted/0.6.2-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
notfound 601818 0.6.2-1
thanks
This bug shouldn't be affecting Squeeze, as reading the original
launchpad bug shows that the crash has been caused by an ubuntu
additional patch.
Cheers, Luca
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Luca Bruno (kaeso)
: :' : The Universal O.S.| lucab (AT) deb
tag 601629 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
What error do you get when you try to mount /home by hand?
-S
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 601629 + moreinfo
Bug #601629 [mount] mount not working after apt-get upgrade (mount)
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
601629: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi
Hi Ralph,
I'm the author of MP3 Diags.
There isn't enough information in the bug report to allow me to fix the issue.
What I'd really like is to get a file from you, along with instructions about
how to make the program crash, and get MP3 Diags to crash on my computer. Then
I should be able to
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 09:40:55PM +0200, Tomasz Rybak wrote [edited]:
> Should I tag somehow bugs related to pyopencl to let everybody
> know that I have fixes waiting for decision?
> Should it be patch or pending, knowing that release managers
> have not taken decision yet?
It doesn't matte
Your message dated Sun, 31 Oct 2010 09:02:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#601935: fixed in cil 0.07.00-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #601935,
regarding cil FTBFS with missing cil command
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Your message dated Sun, 31 Oct 2010 08:33:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#600997: fixed in imagej 1.44i-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #600997,
regarding imagej: cannot quit imagej when an image was changed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Your message dated Sun, 31 Oct 2010 08:33:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#600667: fixed in eglibc 2.11.2-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #600667,
regarding eglibc: cve-2010-3847 dynamic linker expands $ORIGIN in setuid
library search path
to be marked as done.
This means that yo
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 601802 critical
Bug #601802 [sun-java6-jre] sun-java6-jre: update 22 not available in lenny is
a security issue
Severity set to 'critical' from 'normal'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistan
Package: cil
Version: 0.07.00-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: fails to build from source
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu natty ubuntu-patch
Hi,
cil is failing to build in sid, with the following error:
...
debian/rules build
dh_testdir
[ ! -f Makefile ]
87 matches
Mail list logo
