Bug#659832: Retitle and change severity after testing

2012-03-03 Thread Meike Reichle
. If anyone else knows a solution for this feel free to let me know or NMU. Kind regards, Meike Reichle [0] http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas

Bug#554737: gpivtools: diff for NMU version 0.6.0-1.1

2011-12-04 Thread Meike Reichle
Gerber van der Graaf @ 03/12/11 18:42: Great! Is there any action expected from my side? Thank you very much for all. Gerber van der Graaf The package has already been uploaded to the archive. It would be nice if you could acknowledge [0] the NMU in your next maintainer upload. Kind regards,

Bug#555753: moon-lander: diff for NMU version 1.0-4.1

2011-12-03 Thread Meike Reichle
-lander (1:1.0-4.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Fix FTBFS with binutils-gold, added missing link to libm +(Thanks to Paul Merrill ) (Closes: #555753) + * Urgency set to medium, rc Bug fix + + -- Meike Reichle me...@debian.org Sat, 03 Dec 2011 11:44:55 +0100

Bug#554737: gpivtools: diff for NMU version 0.6.0-1.1

2011-12-03 Thread Meike Reichle
Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for gpivtools (versioned as 0.6.0-1.1). The diff is attached to this message. Regards. diff -u gpivtools-0.6.0/debian/changelog gpivtools-0.6.0/debian/changelog --- gpivtools-0.6.0/debian/changelog +++ gpivtools-0.6.0/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@

Bug#524924: Bug no longer reproducible with new version

2010-10-11 Thread Meike Reichle
Hi I've just uploaded a new version of sux. I've added a patch with which I can no longer reproduce the bug, neither on KDE nor Gnome or XFCE4. If you still experience problems please let me know and try to provide further details. Best, Meike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#527215: tulip: diff for NMU version 3.1.2-2.2

2010-01-24 Thread Meike Reichle
for gcc4.4 (Closes: #527215) + + -- Meike Reichle me...@debian.org Sat, 23 Jan 2010 23:46:34 +0100 + tulip (3.1.2-2.1) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload. only in patch2: unchanged: --- tulip-3.1.2.orig/patch +++ tulip-3.1.2/patch @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@ +--- library/tulip-ogl/src

Bug#554987: xvier: diff for NMU version 1.0-7.5

2010-01-24 Thread Meike Reichle
@@ -1,3 +1,17 @@ +xvier (1.0-7.5) unstable; urgency=high + + * Non-maintainer upload. + + [Uwe Kleine-König] + * fix segfault on archs that have sizeof(int) sizeof(int*) +(Closes: #554987) + + [Meike Reichle] + * Bumped standards version (no further changes needed) + * Fixed debian-rules

Bug#553538: iog: dir-or-file-in-var-www /var/www/iog/in.gif and three others

2010-01-24 Thread Meike Reichle
+files there (Closes: #553538) + + -- Meike Reichle me...@debian.org Sat, 23 Jan 2010 17:53:44 +0100 + +iog (1.03-3.2) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Repair 'dir-or-file-in-var-www'. (Closes: #553538) ++ debian/NEWS: New file with package notes refering to FHS

Bug#545651: A patch fixing two bugs and revealing a third

2010-01-22 Thread Meike Reichle
Hi, this patch changes debian/rules to build against itcl3.4 instead of itcl3.2 and against itk3.3 instead of itk3.2. Applying it has you end up with another error though: eval.c: In function 'evaluate_subexp_standard': eval.c:1676: error: 'subscript_array' may be used uninitialized in this

Bug#479442: vim-runtime contains non-free files

2008-05-04 Thread Meike Reichle
Package: vim Version: 1:7.1-266+1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 The vim help files that are installed in /usr/share/vim/vim71/doc/ are licensed under the OPL, (see usr_01.txt for the exact copyright notice) which is considered non-free according to

Bug#479442: closed by James Vega [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Re: Bug#479442: vim-runtime contains non-free files)

2008-05-04 Thread Meike Reichle
Thanks for the clarification and sorry for not noticing #384019 earlier. :) Best, Meike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#465782: Improved patch

2008-03-21 Thread Meike Reichle
+ + -- Meike Reichle [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri, 21 Mar 2008 15:26:28 +0100 + isns (2.1-01+dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=low * Fix location of pid file (Closes: #462006) diff -Nur isns-2.1-01+dfsg/debian/dirs isns-2.1-01+dfsg_meike/debian/dirs --- isns-2.1-01+dfsg/debian/dirs 2008-03-20 19:07:52.0

Bug#465782: Created a patch

2008-03-20 Thread Meike Reichle
) unstable; urgency=low + + * NMU: created patches/iSNSLinux.c_var_lib.patch and changed +dirs (Closes: #465782) + + -- Meike Reichle [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 20 Mar 2008 15:02:55 +0100 + isns (2.1-01+dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=low * Fix location of pid file (Closes: #462006) diff -Nur isns-2.1-01

Bug#467104: Fixed Dependency Bug

2008-03-20 Thread Meike Reichle
tags 467104 + patch thanks Hi, I created a patch that should solve the problem. I tested it using pbuilder and it seems to work. HTH, Meike --- xsp-1.2.5/debian/control 2008-03-20 21:54:36.0 +0100 +++ /tmp/control 2008-03-20 21:51:51.0 +0100 @@ -12,7 +12,9 @@

Bug#469721: Wrote a patch

2008-03-20 Thread Meike Reichle
tags 469721 + patch thanks Hi I wrote a patch that should fix that problem. I removed the respective lines from the Makefile and installed the examples using dh_installexamples HTH, Meike diff -Nur multitail-5.2.0/debian/patches/01_makefile_fixes.dpatch

Bug#363555: Trying to save a new todo item makes yank crash

2006-04-19 Thread Meike Reichle
Package: yank Version: 0.2.1-7.2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When trying to save a new todo item in yank it crashes with the following error message: Gdk-ERROR **: BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes) serial 7797 error_code 8 request_code 62 minor_code 0 I tried

Bug#361952: Please examine Bug#361952

2006-04-12 Thread Meike Reichle
Hi Frank Küster said/sagte on/am 12.04.2006 07:55: I guess this must be a partially upgraded system, tex-common is installed, but not yet configured properly, and tetex-bin (and probably -base) is still at the old version. tetex-bin_2.0.2-31 means that he is using testing, but testing has

Bug#361952: tex4ht-common: Package uninstallable due to missing configuration file

2006-04-11 Thread Meike Reichle
Package: tex4ht-common Version: 20060312-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Installing tex4ht-common fails with this error message: update-texmf: Basic configuration file /etc/texmf/texmf.d/05TeXMF.cnf missing. It can be (quick)fixed doing a touch