Package: update-manager-gnome
Version: 0.200.4-1
Severity: serious
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
update-manager wants to downgrade a package I explicitely installed from
experimental without any special notice. This downgrade would break
functionality on my machine. apt and a
Package: func
Version: 0.24-13
Severity: serious
Tags: security
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Hi, I just did a _very_ cursory look at func from experimental, I don't
think this is supposed to be kept like this:
[22:24] /usr/share/doc/func => ls -l /var/log/func
total 64
-rw-rw-
close 485480
thanks
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Hi, I must apologize for the false alarm.
After trying to get a strace, and looking at bootlogd source, I
realized Linux is a multitasking OS and something else might be
changing the value at the same time. Turns out the real cu
Package: sysvinit
Version: 2.86.ds1-55
Severity: grave
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
sysctl -p seemed to have stopped working on my (mostly) lenny
installation some time ago.
After peppering /lib/lsb/init-functions with lines like
[ -d /proc ] && echo -n "(filemax: `cat /pro
Package: bzip2
Version: 1.0.5-0.1
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Hi. This bug has been quiet for a while... I'm just pinging to see if
there's any progress in fixing it in stable (and possibly oldstable).
Regards,
Zoran
--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel:
Package: uswsusp
Version: 0.3~cvs20060928-6
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss
Hi, uswsusp just tried to resume a previous session even though
the system was booted and filesystems remounted in the meantime.
I usually don't use initrd/initramfs, so I tried to create an
ini
Package: twinkle
Version: 0.7.1-2+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
ldd `which twinkle`
[...]
libccgnu2-1.3.so.2 => not found
[...]
apt-file update && apt-file search libccgnu2-1.3.so.2
finds nothing. There is however a
libcommoncpp2-1.3c2a: usr/lib/libccgnu2-
Quoting Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 02:20:41PM +0200, Zoran Dzelajlija wrote:
> > Quoting Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > > If you can provide me a direct URL for the Ubuntu security patches, I can
> > > probably find tim
Quoting Adam Conrad ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Zoran Dzelajlija wrote:
> >
> > FWIW, patches from Ubuntu might help:
>
> I know, I did the Ubuntu patches.
Heh, I (obviously) didn't know that.
> I need to get the security team in
> the loop to get my changes i
Tags: sarge security
Quoting Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 08:11:27PM +0200, Zoran Dzelajlija wrote:
> > Hi, any word of a sarge release to cover CAN-2005-1921 and, to kill two
> > flies, the new XML_RPC bug CAN-2005-2498? I've applied Ubun
CC-ing the security team as suggested on #debian.
Explanation: this security related bug in XML_RPC, part of php4-pear
package, has been closed by an upload to unstable, but the version in
sarge is still affected.
Quoting Zoran Dzelajlija ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hi, any word of a sarge release
Hi, any word of a sarge release to cover CAN-2005-1921 and, to kill two
flies, the new XML_RPC bug CAN-2005-2498? I've applied Ubuntu's
patches for both to a local build without much hassle...
Also, is there some user-friendly documentation aobut the new BTS
features (found vs. tagging for sarge)
Quoting Christian Hammers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: php4
> Version: 4:4.3.10-15
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
>
> Hello
>
> A security flaw in XML::RPC has become known. From the version numbers
> it seems to affect Debian. (I did not check which distributions and packages
> exactly th
13 matches
Mail list logo
