On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 11:18:27AM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote:
> Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > You list sites that are not be be accessed; the default action (for
> > images, e.g. banners from doubleclick.net) is to replace the image that
> > should have been fetched with the tran
Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I did actually. I would have expected an email, or at least a message to
> d-devel-announce with a list of removed packages. That sucks.
> Thanks for bringing it to my attention!
I have already complained about the procedure on -devel, I suggested to
sen
clone 295060 -1
retitle -1 Should work with symlinks in /etc/wwwoffle, and respect file removals
severity -1 important
thanks
Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue 05 Apr 2005, David Schmitt wrote:
>> http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s10.7.3 says:
>>
>> "local c
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 295060 -1
Bug#295060: wwwoffle: Overwrites local configuration upon upgrade
Bug 295060 cloned as bug 303347.
> retitle -1 Should work with symlinks in /etc/wwwoffle, and respect file
> removals
Bug#303347: wwwoffle: Overwrites local configuratio
On Tue 05 Apr 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
> Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue 05 Apr 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
> >> David Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> I am looking into this, trying to provide a patch - and NMU if Paul
> >> doesn't show up, I really think wwwoffl
On Tue 05 Apr 2005, David Schmitt wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 April 2005 19:21, Paul Slootman wrote:
> > On Tue 05 Apr 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
> > > David Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > The following code is AFAICS not conditional upon first installation,
> > > > thus overriding a local ad
On Tuesday 05 April 2005 19:21, Paul Slootman wrote:
> On Tue 05 Apr 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
> > David Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > The following code is AFAICS not conditional upon first installation,
> > > thus overriding a local admin who has intentionally removed the link.
> > >
>
(Please note that I didn't read mail while I wrote some to this bug, and
now I'm starting to answer from the first mail I got. No offense
intended, but I might not yet know some things you said in later
mails).
Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue 05 Apr 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
>
On Tuesday 05 April 2005 18:34, Frank Küster wrote:
> David Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am looking into this, trying to provide a patch - and NMU if Paul
> doesn't show up, I really think wwwoffle should go back into sarge.
Indeed. Great. Thanks!
> > The "overwwrites local config" pa
On Tue 05 Apr 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
> David Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am looking into this, trying to provide a patch - and NMU if Paul
> doesn't show up, I really think wwwoffle should go back into sarge.
I'm a bit busy with all sorts of things (e.g. new upstream rsync this
we
On Tue 05 Apr 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
>
> In the elif line, this must be $USE_PPP, of course.
Good one.
This looks like it may be _the_ bug...
Paul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
David Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The "overwwrites local config" part is way harder. Looking at the postinst
> gives me the creeps.
I've found one more. This script would be much better readable if it
wouldn't use the same code over and over, without any shell function -
I found at lea
David Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am looking into this, trying to provide a patch - and NMU if Paul
doesn't show up, I really think wwwoffle should go back into sarge.
> Hi *!
>
> The easier part of this problem is addressed by the attached patch:
> wwwoffle.config tries to preseed the
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 06:20:32PM +0100, David Schmitt wrote:
> Hi *!
>
> The easier part of this problem is addressed by the attached patch:
> wwwoffle.config tries to preseed the debconf db with yes/no for boolean values
> which expect true/false.
>
> The "overwwrites local config" part is way
Hi *!
[Pressed send to early :( there was a final thing]
Line 523++:
| chmod 0640 ${CONFIG}*; chown proxy:proxy ${CONFIG}*
[...]
| chown proxy /etc/wwwoffle
| chmod u+w /etc/wwwoffle
I don't know how this should be handled, but it smells too.
Upon fixing those things, one probably should also
Hi *!
The easier part of this problem is addressed by the attached patch:
wwwoffle.config tries to preseed the debconf db with yes/no for boolean values
which expect true/false.
The "overwwrites local config" part is way harder. Looking at the postinst
gives me the creeps. Just a few quotes which
16 matches
Mail list logo
