Bug#385760: The dspam daemon should NOT be run by user dspam or default port needs to move

2010-10-29 Thread Julien Valroff
Le vendredi 29 oct. 2010 à 15:02:37 (+0200), Julien Cristau a écrit : > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 06:45:52 +0200, Julien Valroff wrote: > > > tags 385760 + pending > > thanks > > > > Le jeudi 28 oct. 2010 à 00:55:18 (+0200), Martin Zobel-Helas a écrit : > > > Hi, > > > > Hi Martin, > > > > > in

Bug#385760: The dspam daemon should NOT be run by user dspam or default port needs to move

2010-10-29 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 06:45:52 +0200, Julien Valroff wrote: > tags 385760 + pending > thanks > > Le jeudi 28 oct. 2010 à 00:55:18 (+0200), Martin Zobel-Helas a écrit : > > Hi, > > Hi Martin, > > > in the default configuration of dspam, if daemon gets enabled, the > > daemon wants to listen o

Processed: Re: Bug#385760: The dspam daemon should NOT be run by user dspam or default port needs to move

2010-10-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 385760 + pending Bug #385760 [dspam] The dspam daemon should NOT be run by user dspam Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 385760: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi

Bug#385760: The dspam daemon should NOT be run by user dspam or default port needs to move

2010-10-27 Thread Julien Valroff
tags 385760 + pending thanks Le jeudi 28 oct. 2010 à 00:55:18 (+0200), Martin Zobel-Helas a écrit : > Hi, Hi Martin, > in the default configuration of dspam, if daemon gets enabled, the > daemon wants to listen on tcp port 24. Starting dspam per default as > user dspam then will just not work.

Bug#385760: The dspam daemon should NOT be run by user dspam or default port needs to move

2010-10-27 Thread Martin Zobel-Helas
Hi, in the default configuration of dspam, if daemon gets enabled, the daemon wants to listen on tcp port 24. Starting dspam per default as user dspam then will just not work. Linux prevents direct “reserved port” assignments by any process other than system root. So you either let it run by root