Package: general
Severity: wishlist
Often new users encounter
You have new mail in /home/nordsburg/Maildir/
$ mail
mail: /home/nordsburg/Maildir/: Is a directory
One sees it often. At least the reminder mechanism, knowing where the
mail is hidden on the system, could also give a hint in its messa
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 04:30:14PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
> > Per Olofsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Frank Küster:
> > >> Were can I read up on how and why I should do this?
> > >
> > > /usr/share/doc/autotools-dev/README.Debian.g
Hi Ho!
I have been taking my time, reading all the responses and reflecting on
them.
We have to start with where the Xen project is currently at:
1) Xen is not yet part of the kernel, and the patches are rather
invasive, and hard to add to anything other than a vanilla kernel.org
tree, and are a
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 02:08:00PM -0500, sean finney wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 11:30:16AM -0700, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> > A grave bug has been file against a package I maintain pointing out
> > that the package does not work on AMD64 and in fact never has, even
> > though it builds on AMD6
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 11:30:16AM -0700, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> A grave bug has been file against a package I maintain pointing out
> that the package does not work on AMD64 and in fact never has, even
> though it builds on AMD64. Since it turns out this package has never
> worked on AMD64, this b
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Mike O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libjxta-java
Version : 2.6.3
Upstream Author : "Jxta Development Team" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://jxta.org/
* License : Jxta software license (based on apache li
[Shaun Jackman]
> A grave bug has been file against a package I maintain pointing out
> that the package does not work on AMD64 and in fact never has, even
> though it builds on AMD64. Since it turns out this package has never
> worked on AMD64, this bug is not a regression, but the status-quo.
>
I would no longer like to be a custmer . Please cancel my callwave
account.
thank you.
hi shaun,
perhaps someone else will be able to answer this more authoritatively
but in the meantime...
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 11:30:16AM -0700, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> A grave bug has been file against a package I maintain pointing out
> that the package does not work on AMD64 and in fact never h
A grave bug has been file against a package I maintain pointing out
that the package does not work on AMD64 and in fact never has, even
though it builds on AMD64. Since it turns out this package has never
worked on AMD64, this bug is not a regression, but the status-quo.
Should such a bug be grave,
The next Debian Installer team opened meeting is scheduled for
Saturday Mar 4th 17:00 UTC.
This meeting will be focused on post-beta2 release goals. The D-I
beta2 release is currently scheduled for the same day, so March 4th
will be a pretty much important date for D-I.
The Wiki page is opened fo
Hi Cord!
First of all, thanks for the listamster work involving spam.
Cord Beermann wrote:
> Also we (the listmasters) don't train the bayes-filter,
May I ask why?
> we add also rules to procmail and SpamAssassin if nessecary.
That's great, thanks.
--
.''`. I may not have gone where I in
Hallo! Du (Blars Blarson) hast geschrieben:
>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>>on 2: we would need a whole spam-mail including all headers so we can
>> find charakteristika to filter on, so i now take all nominated
>> postings, and try to find patterns with some
[Gustavo Franco]
> I won't waste my time writing a patch without hear Lars' and lintian
> maintainers opinions first.
Fair enough, but your original statement was, IMO, too vague. You said
"some of" the piuparts-detected problems looked as though lintian
should be able to catch them, but you did
14 matches
Mail list logo
