Atsuhito Kohda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If I understand correctly it is recommended to use pbuilder for
> packaging and I've done so when I updated packages recently. Then I got
> a bug report that a nice feature was suddenly lost and I found that
> configure script failed to find out very c
Hi all,
If I understand correctly it is recommended to use pbuilder
for packaging and I've done so when I updated packages recently.
Then I got a bug report that a nice feature was suddenly lost
and I found that configure script failed to find out very common
applications because pbuilder didn't
Hi all,
Recently, perhaps mainly due to so many spams, it looks common
to write email address like "foo at some.where" etc. and
I wonder if it is acceptable to use such modified email address
in Upstream Author field of debian/copyright file.
I come to think this because when I updated one of m
Am Dienstag, 18. September 2007 21:12:44 schrieb Julien Cristau:
> > Hmmhh, what do you do about programs etc that encode the build-time in
> > the binary? I mean they obviously will change between builds?
>
> Hopefully they don't encode the build-time in the file list?
We checked not for files whi
Hi Norbert,
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 22:02:41 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> we are wondering why texlive-base and texlive-bin don't enter testing,
>> and I fail to understand the output of the update excuses at
[...]
> testing has texlive-base 2007-10, and texlive-bin 2007-12.
>
> P
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: wired
Version : 0.5.0
Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : https://sourceforge.net/projects/wired/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description : Music creation
* 18-09-2007, Bernd Zeimetz
* User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.8.1.4)
Gecko/20070828 Thunderbird/2.0.0.4 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0
>
>> * Allow messages, that have "In-reply-to" and "References" with valid
>> message-id's (SHOULD in rfc2822) to pass to bts/ml freely.
>
> Why? This
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 20:49:03 +0200, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 22:34 +0200, Patrick Winnertz wrote:
> > Hi,
> [...]
> > Furthermore we detect some issues with different package content (compared
> > to the first build) after the second and third build. This bugs will hav
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 22:34 +0200, Patrick Winnertz wrote:
> Hi,
[...]
> Furthermore we detect some issues with different package content (compared
> to the first build) after the second and third build. This bugs will have
> Severity: Serious.
Hmmhh, what do you do about programs etc that encod
Am Dienstag 18 September 2007 schrieb Ken Spath:
> If after I install casu or netdiag, I type man casu or man netdiag
> there is nothing.
>
> whereis / find / apt-cache search / apt-file search were necessary
>
> How many current debian users and users of forked distributions know
> of apt-file o
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 11:24:21PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 03:35:15PM -0500, Peter Samuelson a ?crit :
> I fully agree with what you write. Indeed what I support is not to ignore
> the RFC or other similarly non-free, non-programmatic files, but to
> document them in
Hello,
In our factory we have 2 old but reliable servers. Is there any interest
for them ?
They are available near Strasbourg, in France.
2 Digital server series 5000 :
each server has :
- Dual CPU PII 333 MHZ
- 512 MB
- Adaptec SCSI Raid and 3 SCSI discs of 9 GB each. Tape backup ...
See th
Proposal regarding future packaging:
Add an additional manual page to new/future/updated packages that is
the same as the package name. IF and only IF there would NOT be a
conflict with an existant necessary manual page AND IF there is no
binary in a package that is the same as the package name.
> > it turned out the problem is in the XFS filesystem, that is 20x slower,
> > than the ext3 filesystem. I know that XFS is bad at handling small
> > files, but 20x times?
>
> Try to play with parameters mentioned in laptop-mode.txt in the Linux
> sources.
>
> Then, try to have XFS log area on sep
Le Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 03:35:15PM -0500, Peter Samuelson a écrit :
> A lot of users appreciate our promise to read all the licenses so they
> don't have to.
> as I explain further, suddenly we have a user who notices, for the
> first time, that the RFC (or Sun Java, or whatever) actually _does_
Raphael Hertzog writes ("Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on
freedom"):
> I also argued (on IRC) about the fact that removing some non-free parts
> of upstream source tarballs (like RFC) is not really worth it if we make
> sure that it doesn't end up in binary packages.
I agree wit
Am 2007-09-17 12:16:18, schrieb Bastian Blank:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 10:32:06AM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> > since 2007-08-01 I am now jobless (yeah, the new French GOV do not like
> > that I stay in the army as PMC) and today (Saturday) I was asked by an
> > owner of a german Enterprise
> * Allow messages, that have "In-reply-to" and "References" with valid
> message-id's (SHOULD in rfc2822) to pass to bts/ml freely.
Why? This can be faked easily, getting them together with a destination
email address should be pretty easy for spammers.
> * Opening new threads in MLs requires
18 matches
Mail list logo
