Package: wnpp
Owner: Ryan Niebur
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libperl-metrics-simple-perl
Version : 0.12
Upstream Author : Matisse Enzer
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Perl-Metrics-Simple/
* License : Arti
Package: wnpp
Owner: Ryan Niebur
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libstatistics-basic-perl
Version : 1.6005
Upstream Author : Paul Miller
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Statistics-Basic/
* License : LGPL-2.1
Package: wnpp
Owner: Ryan Niebur
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libtest-useallmodules-perl
Version : 0.10
Upstream Author : Kenichi Ishigaki
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-UseAllModules/
* License : Art
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 06:43:00PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
>>> The generated, new symbols file looks something like:
>
> Why exactly is this file "generated", and how? Symbols files don't work
> very well if they aren't being deliberately maintained; it would be much
>
+ Andrei Popescu (Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:56:29 +0300):
> On Wed,29.Apr.09, 14:27:45, Darren Salt wrote:
> > The list management software, OTOH, can [add] a Mail-Followup-To
> > header, if one is not already present, containing the list address
> > and, if the sender is not subscribed, his address.
>
On 11735 March 1977, Charles Plessy wrote:
> +If you think your package needs some explanations for the administrators of
> the
> +new package queue, include them in your changelog, reply to the email you
> +receive as a maintainer after your upload, or reply to the rejection email in
> +case you
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Brett Profitt
* Package name: elgg
Version : 1.5
Upstream Author : Brett Profitt
* URL : http://www.elgg.org/
* License : (GPL)
Programming Lang: (PHP)
Description : PHP-based social networking framework
Elgg
Hi all,
== First proposed MBF:
DEHS and the DDPO both have hacks to remove the 'dfsg' part of Debian's
version number in case the watch file doesn't do it on its own. This hack
is not just ugly, but also bogus.
I would therefore like to file bug reports (severity: minor) against the
packages that
Le mercredi 29 avril 2009 à 18:51 +0200, Jiří Paleček a écrit :
> I've hacked a little into dpkg-shlibdeps and while doing this, I've found
> that the code makes allowance for a single library being mentioned in two
> different symbol files. I'd like to ask if (and when) can such situation
>
Hello,
I've hacked a little into dpkg-shlibdeps and while doing this, I've found
that the code makes allowance for a single library being mentioned in two
different symbol files. I'd like to ask if (and when) can such situation
actually arise.
Regards
Jiri Palecek
--
Using Opera's re
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 09:56:21AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> Osamu Aoki writes:
>
> > As I checked popularity of similar plain text formatters via popcon,
> >
> >
> > http://people.debian.org/~osamu/pub/getwiki/html/ch12.en.html#listoftoolstohigghtplaintextdata
...
> The correct package to
On Wed,29.Apr.09, 14:27:45, Darren Salt wrote:
> I demand that Ben Finney may or may not have written...
>
> [snip]
> > If someone writes a message to a list, but doesn't arrange to read messages
> > from that list, I don't think we can expect software to automatically
> > figure out that they wou
Le Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 02:22:14PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
> Given that, in response to your upload, you will get an email
> precisely mentioning the "NEW" status of your package, the most
> natural place to provide such comments is by replying to that email.
Le Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 09
I demand that Ben Finney may or may not have written...
[snip]
> If someone writes a message to a list, but doesn't arrange to read messages
> from that list, I don't think we can expect software to automatically
> figure out that they would nevertheless like to receive those messages.
We certain
+ Stefano Zacchiroli (Tue, 28 Apr 2009 22:16:26 +0200):
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 09:45:41PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > Anyway, the exact list of Bin-NMUs is rather uninteresting. More
> > interesting can be, I think, the current list of known transitions
> > against which the Release Team wo
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 11:11:42PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Personally, I'm fine with giving up on the no-cc policy. Just about
> every other technical mailing list that I read tends to accumulate cc's
> until someone gets around to removing them, and mostly people just deal
> with a bit of gr
+ Ben Finney (Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:04:05 +1000):
> Caveat: I tried it and dropped it because its support for Unicode is
> currently broken (Bug#520374), and Ruby isn't a language I'm able to
> hack.
#477366, really.
--
- Are you sure we're good?
- Always.
-- Rory and Lorelai
--
To UNS
And our program is mostly automated. You just plug in and enjoy earnings and
results.
Come check out our product and reserve a top spot in the program before the
masses join:
http://alive7.startbesilver.in/?b=ZGViaWFuLWRldmVsQGxpc3RzLmRlYmlhbi5vcmc
Thank you,
M. Gold
"Giacomo A. Catenazzi" writes:
> Ben Finney wrote:
> > If someone writes a message to a list, but doesn't arrange to read
> > messages from that list, I don't think we can expect software to
> > automatically figure out that they would nevertheless like to
> > receive those messages.
>
[…]
> Bu
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andrew Lee
The upstream split this as a separate package from lxde-common in
version 0.4. So I submit this ITP for packaging the new version.
* Package name: lxde-settings-daemon
Version : 0.4
Upstream Author : Hong Jen Yee (PCMan)
* URL
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Well, if you just keep them as transitional period without
highlighting them as "deprecated" in some way, you will end up with
them forever. We all know how slow we are with this kind of
transitions :)
ACK
Given that the current semantics was to
Ben Finney wrote:
Frank Lin PIAT writes:
Note that at the moment, my MUA (Evolution) has three buttons. None
behave "correctly" for mailing lists:
Reply = Reply to sender only
Reply to all = reply to all previous sender and recipients
Reply to list = Reply to list only, dropping non-subscribed
"Joe Smith" writes:
> "Mark Brown" wrote in message
> news:20090427092413.ga1...@sirena.org.uk...
> > Indeed; [an inline table of bytes] is a *very* common way of
> > expressing register values, especially when working with large
> > numbers of them at once. I've no idea what Robert believes the
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 12:13:14AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Yes, me too. But somewhere in this longish discussion it was
> suggested to find a solution for currently existing descriptions and
> ditch these cases later. I do not want to spend my time to seek for
> the URL of this mail in the
Le mardi 28 avril 2009 à 22:36 -0500, Peter Samuelson a écrit :
> Let's see ... another series of MUA-related standards documents, RFC
> 2045 and following (Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions), was
> published in November 1996, close to 2 years before the one we're
> talking about. Maybe it's j
"Mark Brown" wrote in message
news:20090427092413.ga1...@sirena.org.uk...
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 01:48:27AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sun, 2009-04-26 at 21:41 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> #494120 and #494122.
[...]
I disagree with these as the tables in question are easily small
Frank Lin PIAT writes:
> Note that at the moment, my MUA (Evolution) has three buttons. None
> behave "correctly" for mailing lists:
> Reply = Reply to sender only
> Reply to all = reply to all previous sender and recipients
> Reply to list = Reply to list only, dropping non-subscribed sender.
T
27 matches
Mail list logo
