On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 01:34 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 13, Colin Watson wrote:
>
> > > Marco, do you have any plans for using this scheme as an option or as
> > > the default?
> Yes, because the upstream maintainers decided that the current scheme
> cannot work and will remove support fo
On Aug 13, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Marco, do you have any plans for using this scheme as an option or as
> > the default?
Yes, because the upstream maintainers decided that the current scheme
cannot work and will remove support for it.
I do not know how long it will be feasible to keep it as a De
On 08/13/2011 09:59 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Neil McGovern , 2011-08-01, 22:07:
>> As noted in our previous mail [0DAY:DDA], bug #625449 has been opened
>> against developers-reference. This now seems to be drawing itself to a
>> conclusion. We would still welcome use of delayed queues where
>> ap
Am 13.08.2011 21:59, schrieb Jakub Wilk:
> * Neil McGovern , 2011-08-01, 22:07:
>> As noted in our previous mail [0DAY:DDA], bug #625449 has been opened
>> against developers-reference. This now seems to be drawing itself to a
>> conclusion. We would still welcome use of delayed queues where
>> app
* Neil McGovern , 2011-08-01, 22:07:
As noted in our previous mail [0DAY:DDA], bug #625449 has been opened
against developers-reference. This now seems to be drawing itself to a
conclusion. We would still welcome use of delayed queues where
appropriate, but this also formalises the policy over
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 10:27:08AM +0200, Stephan Windmüller wrote:
> For more than a half year I am monitoring the state of the non-free
> teamspeak packages. A new upstream version is available for more than a
> year (bug #594318) and there is also a grave bug with an attached patch
> (bug #59830
On 08/09/2011 07:31 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> I got fed up by people reporting bug on libc6, while this problem results
> from a decision Debian to implement multiarch. People should work on
> implementing a compatibility wrapper and to make upstream toolchain
> multiarch aware. Until this is don
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 02:55:51PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> There is a new network device naming scheme that uses physical location
> (slot number or firmware-provided port number) to name PCI network
> devices. So far this is implemented in Fedora 15 and RHEL 6.1 (!). I
> assume this would
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andrea Colangelo
* Package name: pinpoint
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Øyvind Kolås
* URL : https://live.gnome.org/Pinpoint
* License : LGPL-2.1
Programming Lang: C
Description : Tool for making hackers do exc
> Paul Wise writes:
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 5:12 AM, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
>> I wonder, is it possible to add a bit more magic to debexpo, so that
>> the comments made via the Web interface would be forwarded to the
>> list, and vice versa?
>> Perhaps Gmane's engine (which is, IIRC,
On Sat, 13 Aug 2011 16:48:39 +0200
Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-08-13 at 13:28:36 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > During bootstraping a new architecture, there are sometimes ugly
> > build-dependency-loops (usually involving generating documentation
> > for the core build utilities means y
On Sat, 13 Aug 2011, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Resulting packages
>
> All binary packages built need to be functionally working, and follow
> the standard for packages on ftp-master. This means they could e.g.
> miss documentation (as long as they are not RC-buggy, i.e. they need
> to have changelog
Hi!
On Sat, 2011-08-13 at 13:28:36 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> During bootstraping a new architecture, there are sometimes ugly
> build-dependency-loops (usually involving generating documentation
> for the core build utilities means you need to have the architecture
> already available; same wi
* Joachim Breitner (nome...@debian.org) [110813 16:05]:
> Hi,
>
> just a minor note:
>
> Am Samstag, den 13.08.2011, 13:28 +0200 schrieb Andreas Barth:
> > To mark such packages and to be able to decide when to re-schedule the
> > build, all binary-packages get the additional header
> > Build-D
* Colin Watson (cjwat...@debian.org) [110813 15:27]:
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 01:28:36PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > During bootstraping a new architecture, there are sometimes ugly
> > build-dependency-loops (usually involving generating documentation
> > for the core build utilities means yo
* Eugene V. Lyubimkin (jac...@debian.org) [110813 14:58]:
> On 2011-08-13 13:28, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > Building with core Dependencies only
> >
> > If doing an build of the core functionality only, norecommends is
> > added to the environment DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS. This is the signal for
> > dpkg-b
Hi,
just a minor note:
Am Samstag, den 13.08.2011, 13:28 +0200 schrieb Andreas Barth:
> To mark such packages and to be able to decide when to re-schedule the
> build, all binary-packages get the additional header
> Build-Depends: minmal package_version
> injected, so that one could see la
On Sat, 2011-08-13 at 12:51 +0200, Hector Oron wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Getting late to discussion, apologies for that.
>
> 2011/7/26 Jonas Smedegaard :
> > On 11-07-26 at 12:03pm, Paul Wise wrote:
>
> >> We were thinking that it might be nice to add support to
> >> openssh-server for installing th
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 01:28:36PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> During bootstraping a new architecture, there are sometimes ugly
> build-dependency-loops (usually involving generating documentation
> for the core build utilities means you need to have the architecture
> already available; same wit
Le Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 01:28:36PM +0200, Andreas Barth a écrit :
>
> We should be able to specify in the package saying "only these
> build-dependencies are needed to get a functionally working package".
> For such an build, the packages which are not needed for building
> working core packages a
On 2011-08-13 13:28, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Building with core Dependencies only
>
> If doing an build of the core functionality only, norecommends is
> added to the environment DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS. This is the signal for
> dpkg-buildpackage etc to only check for the minimal set of packages,
> and f
On Sat, 13 Aug 2011 11:44:46 + (UTC)
Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2011-08-13, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > Introducing Build-Recommends / Build-Core-Depends
>
> I like making it easier to bootstrap new architectures, but I don't like
> overloading the 'recommends' word with a partly different meani
On 2011-08-13, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Introducing Build-Recommends / Build-Core-Depends
I like making it easier to bootstrap new architectures, but I don't like
overloading the 'recommends' word with a partly different meaning.
(And since this is my biggest issue with this proposal, I think it i
Hi,
During bootstraping a new architecture, there are sometimes ugly
build-dependency-loops (usually involving generating documentation
for the core build utilities means you need to have the architecture
already available; same with graphical tools). During DebConf, Wookey
had a talk which lead
Hello,
Getting late to discussion, apologies for that.
2011/7/26 Jonas Smedegaard :
> On 11-07-26 at 12:03pm, Paul Wise wrote:
>> We were thinking that it might be nice to add support to
>> openssh-server for installing the package, not generating the host
>> keys and then generating them on f
Package: wnpp
Owner: Maximilian Gass
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libbot-training-perl
Version : 0.04
Upstream Author : Ãvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Bot-Tr
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Stephan Windmüller
wrote:
> Does anyone know something about this maintainer or the states of these
> packages?
It looks like he isn't active on other packages too, for eg
aircrack-ng (RC bug) or ntfs-3g (hijacked).
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWis
Hello!
For more than a half year I am monitoring the state of the non-free
teamspeak packages. A new upstream version is available for more than a
year (bug #594318) and there is also a grave bug with an attached patch
(bug #598304).
However, there has been no reply by the maintainer of the packa
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 5:12 AM, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
> I wonder, is it possible to add a bit more magic to debexpo, so
> that the comments made via the Web interface would be forwarded
> to the list, and vice versa?
>
> Perhaps Gmane's engine (which is, IIRC, free softw
29 matches
Mail list logo
