Re: auditd as logrotate replacement?

Julian Gilbey wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 08:35:51PM -0300, Alejo Sanchez wrote: > > well, your version would do it the dlopen() way. > > actually we were going to ask if there was a > > restriction on depending on dlopen(), as it could > > be possible

Re: auditd as logrotate replacement?

Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > > > > > What it does use for crypto is openssl's libcrypt, > > wich is NOT needed when used as a simple (traditional) > > rotate system. So Debian can ship audit[d], and if > > a user wants it's advanced crypto support, she/he should > > install openssl package. > > >

Re: auditd as logrotate replacement?

"Steve M. Robbins" wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 01:03:03PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > > > Since it is in non-us, at least for now that means it will not appear on a > > official debian cd. > > When I burned the 2.2r2 iso's last December, there was both a > "crippled" and a "non-us