Re: serious bug. Evolution and Microsoft mentality.

2002-01-09 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Wed, 2002-01-09 at 01:43, Jonathan Walther wrote: > On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 01:56:24PM -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > >Yea, this is kinda painful currently but hopefully by 1.2 this will be > >much easier. We plan on making it so that you can add a new account > >usin

Re: serious bug. Evolution and Microsoft mentality.

2002-01-09 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Wed, 2002-01-09 at 16:20, Jonathan Walther wrote: > On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 01:41:28PM -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > >> Unfortunately, no. I made no changes whatsoever to the mailboxes. I > >> just entered them to see if the messages showed up, they did, then I >

Re: serious bug. Evolution and Microsoft mentality.

2002-01-09 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
; > > And then before using it, do this: > > memset(folder_path, 0, sizeof folder_path); > > Cheers. > > Jonathan > > On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 04:57:34PM -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > >> You solved the problem. That is the correct solution. After runni

Re: serious bug. Evolution and Microsoft mentality.

2002-01-10 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
Actually the attached patch is the "correct one". There is no need to memset and you should use PATH_MAX rather than 4096. Jeff On Wed, 2002-01-09 at 23:36, Jonathan Walther wrote: > On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 07:38:43PM -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > >Oops, copy/paste-o when

Re: serious bug. Evolution and Microsoft mentality.

2002-01-10 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
bytes, in the buffer pointed to by resolved_name. Jeff On Thu, 2002-01-10 at 13:27, Jeroen Dekkers wrote: > On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 12:38:30PM -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > > Actually the attached patch is the "correct one". There is no need to > > m