(I'm not on -devel, so I constructed this reply by hand.)
> And given the reaction to porn-get and bitchx and
> whatever-the-stripping-cpu-monitor-was-called , I tend to assume[2] that
> the true intent of such an ITP is to instigate yet another 500 post
> flame war between the "but what about the
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Panu Kalliokoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: sokoedit
Version : 1
Upstream Author : Panu Kalliokoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://sange.fi/~atehwa/sokoedit/
* License : BSD-like
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Panu Kalliokoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: gauche-readline
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Julian Fondren, Shiro Kawai
* URL : http://www.shiro.dreamhost.com/scheme/gauche/packages.html
* License :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Panu Kalliokoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: b5
Version : x.y.z
Upstream Author : Panu Kalliokoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://sange.fi/~atehwa/b5/
* License : BSD-like
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Panu Kalliokoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: python-selecting
Version : 0.92
Upstream Author : Panu Kalliokoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://sange.fi/~atehwa/selecting/
* License : BSD-like
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Panu Kalliokoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: cgames
Version : 2.2
Upstream Author : Panu Kalliokoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.muppetlabs.com/~breadbox/software/cgames.html
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Panu Kalliokoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: bfc
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Panu Kalliokoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://sange.fi/~atehwa/bf/
* License : BSD-like
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Panu Kalliokoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: stx2any
Version : 1.53
Upstream Author : Panu Kalliokoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://sange.fi/~atehwa/Stx/README.html
* License : BSD-like
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 08:57:07PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > I would like to ask whether there really is such a guideline, and if so,
> > which are the technical / political reasons that lead to it.
> a) If there is a bug in the packaging, it can be fixed without uploading
> a new upstream s
ormed about one technical detail, which is that when you only
make changes to packaging, you only need to change the .diff.gz.
However, I don't understand the benefit of this, and I've been
maintaining my software as debian-native projects for many years,
without any observable proble
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 02:46:12PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > Apparently you are much better off on a Pentium or Athlon with
> > i386 optimized code than i486 optimized one.
> I vaguely recall something similar about the i586.
FWIK, almost everything that can be done in two ways on ix86, li
On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 01:38:42PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 08:00:02PM +0300, Panu Kalliokoski wrote:
> > I'll throw in my views on the subject:
>
> > (1) If I understand correctly, SONAMEs are not meant to provide any
> > other met
(first-time poster, beware of possible stupidity)
I'll throw in my views on the subject:
(1) If I understand correctly, SONAMEs are not meant to provide any
other metadata than a reference to the *library's* ABI. Using SONAMEs for
anything else, like which compiler the library was built with, wil
13 matches
Mail list logo
