trouble finding source for mail-notification on i386

The latest source for mail-notification has a version number of 3.0.dfsg.1-7 However, the latest i386 binary for mail-notification has a version number of 3.0.dfsg.1-7+b1 What does the extra +b1 mean? How do I recreate the i386 build of mail-notification? thanks, Tim -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Re: trouble sending email with caff (pgp-tools / signing-party)

On 5/8/06, Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On May 08, Tim Olsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's because it's behind a firewall like I said. My mail works > fine, as long as the Sender: field is not set. No, the envelope sender is wrong and the Sen

Re: trouble sending email with caff (pgp-tools / signing-party)

On 5/8/06, Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, 08 May 2006, Tim Olsen wrote: > Is this something that should be fixed in perl's mailtools or is my > MTA setup not kosher? I prefer to have my MTA send mail because my > internal networks smart host is overloade

trouble sending email with caff (pgp-tools / signing-party)

07nZ-31; Mon, 08 May 2006 13:29:34 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Your signed PGP key 0x89CD4B21607559E6 User-Agent: caff 0.0.0.278 - http://pgp-tools.alioth.debian.org/ X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.420 (Entity 5.420) Sender: "Tim Olsen,,," <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: multipart/encrypted;

Re: Bug#354831: ITP: bfc -- Brainfuck compiler

On 3/1/06, Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 01-Mar-06, 13:05 (CST), Tim Olsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It's "An Eight-Instruction Turing-Complete Programming Language." > > Yeah, I know. That doesn't make it "useful&quo

Re: Bug#354831: ITP: bfc -- Brainfuck compiler

It's "An Eight-Instruction Turing-Complete Programming Language." See: I suggest a better description for the ITP so people can see that the purpose of the package is not necessarily only to offend (if at all). -