At 13:22 -0700 1998-06-24, Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
. 2.0.34 needs the x-bit on shared libraries!
Actually, no, it's just the dynamic linker that needs to be executable.
This is apparently a security feature, 2.1 kernels also require an
executable dynamic linker, and thus 2.2 will as well.
On Wed, Jun 24, 1998 at 05:50:08PM -0700, Joel Klecker wrote:
: At 13:22 -0700 1998-06-24, Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
: . 2.0.34 needs the x-bit on shared libraries!
:
: Actually, no, it's just the dynamic linker that needs to be executable.
:
: This is apparently a security feature, 2.1
Hello,
as somebody (Harald Schueler [EMAIL PROTECTED] pointed out
and as we (Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED] and me) could
reproduce after some grief about a non-functional ftp server (using
wu-ftpd-academ) we got the impression, that
. 2.0.34 needs the x-bit on shared libraries!
This is
Heiko Schlittermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
as somebody (Harald Schueler [EMAIL PROTECTED] pointed out
and as we (Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED] and me) could
reproduce after some grief about a non-functional ftp server (using
wu-ftpd-academ) we got the impression, that
.
4 matches
Mail list logo