Le vendredi 30 décembre 2005 à 17:55 +0100, Mike Hommey a écrit :
Something troubles me. You make unofficial packages while waiting for official
packages. Aren't you DD ? Wouldn't uploading these unofficial packages
in unstable make them official ?
I don't think we need more packages
ti, 2006-01-03 kello 21:06 +0100, Josselin Mouette kirjoitti:
Le vendredi 30 décembre 2005 à 17:55 +0100, Mike Hommey a écrit :
Something troubles me. You make unofficial packages while waiting for
official
packages. Aren't you DD ? Wouldn't uploading these unofficial packages
in
Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Le vendredi 30 décembre 2005 à 17:55 +0100, Mike Hommey a écrit :
Something troubles me. You make unofficial packages while waiting for
official
packages. Aren't you DD ? Wouldn't uploading these unofficial packages
in unstable make them official ?
Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Le vendredi 30 décembre 2005 à 17:55 +0100, Mike Hommey a écrit :
Something troubles me. You make unofficial packages while waiting for
official
packages. Aren't you DD ? Wouldn't uploading these unofficial packages
in unstable make them official ?
Hello,
Am Freitag, den 30.12.2005, 08:35 +0100 schrieb Frank Lichtenheld:
On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 11:55:17PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
There is already a libgpod0 package on Christian Marillat's archive, so I
guess there must be an issue regarding this package's relation with debian.
Felipe Sateler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There is already a libgpod0 package on Christian Marillat's archive, so I
guess there must be an issue regarding this package's relation with debian.
No issues for this package. I simply did these packages because this is
more fast to me, instead of
On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 10:54:25AM +0100, Christian Marillat [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
Felipe Sateler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There is already a libgpod0 package on Christian Marillat's archive, so I
guess there must be an issue regarding this package's relation with debian.
No issues
Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 10:54:25AM +0100, Christian Marillat [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
No issues for this package. I simply did these packages because this is
more fast to me, instead of waiting for an official package. Nice to play
with artworks
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: libgpod
Version : 0.3.0
Upstream Author : Jorg Schuler (jcsjcs at users dot sourceforge dot net)
* URL : http://www.gtkpod.org
* License : GPL
Description : a
There is already a libgpod0 package on Christian Marillat's archive, so I
guess there must be an issue regarding this package's relation with debian.
--
Felipe Sateler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 11:55:17PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
There is already a libgpod0 package on Christian Marillat's archive, so I
guess there must be an issue regarding this package's relation with debian.
I can see no evidence for that, especially since most of the code
is already in
11 matches
Mail list logo