Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bastian Blank wrote:
>>> (BTW, Brian, this discussion reminds me that I'd like to use alternatives
>>> for krb5.conf.5 so that krb5-doc and heimdal-doc don't need to conflict.
>> Prdon, this is missuse of that mechanism. man already can do that.
> How?
Al
Bastian Blank wrote:
>> (BTW, Brian, this discussion reminds me that I'd like to use alternatives
>> for krb5.conf.5 so that krb5-doc and heimdal-doc don't need to conflict.
>>
>
> Prdon, this is missuse of that mechanism. man already can do that.
>
How?
Brian May
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
Michael Tautschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, if alternatives is the wrong approach, let's try an analytical approach:
>
> - heimdal-clients and krb5-user must not both be installed: Clearly,
> conflicts: is indicated. Then both may provide kadmin. It will break
> no system (they can'
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 07:19:44PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Using alternatives for kadmin is more problematic.
> Which means that you need to find a consens and rename _both_ if none is
> found.
I certainly agree that's an even worse option.
--
> Yeah, I'm reasonably sure that alternatives are wrong for kadmin.
> Editor is intended to be used by a user. Kadmin is often used by
> users but is also quite often used by scripts.
>
[...]
Well, if alternatives is the wrong approach, let's try an analytical approach:
- heimdal-clients and kr
Yeah, I'm reasonably sure that alternatives are wrong for kadmin.
Editor is intended to be used by a user. Kadmin is often used by
users but is also quite often used by scripts.
Editors also can all work with text files. It's basically not true
that you can use a heimdal kadmin against an MIT re
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 07:19:44PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Using alternatives for kadmin is more problematic.
Which means that you need to find a consens and rename _both_ if none is
found.
> (BTW, Brian, this discussion reminds me that I'd like to use alternatives
> for krb5.conf.5 so that
Michael Tautschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Can I please have some input into this bug report?
>>
>> The report itself seems valid, ideally these packages shouldn't conflict.
>>
>> Solving this in such a way as not to break lots of stuff could be
>> awkward though.
>>
>> Ideas?
Adding alt
> Hello,
>
> Can I please have some input into this bug report?
>
> The report itself seems valid, ideally these packages shouldn't conflict.
>
> Solving this in such a way as not to break lots of stuff could be
> awkward though.
>
> Ideas?
>
Are you guys really sure that alternatives are so mis
Hello,
Can I please have some input into this bug report?
The report itself seems valid, ideally these packages shouldn't conflict.
Solving this in such a way as not to break lots of stuff could be
awkward though.
Ideas?
Brian May
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
10 matches
Mail list logo
