On Sat, 06 Mar 2010, Mike Hommey wrote:
> /dev/something just feels so wrong. /dev contains block and character
> devices, and almost nothing else (except some udev and initramfs files)
Not really. There's the whole /dev/shm crap (which one is not supposed to
access directly anyway).
> Why shoul
On Mar 07, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > Why not? /dev/pts/ is a kernel filesystem mounted below /dev, and /dev
> > itself is a kernel filesystem (tmpfs or devtmpfs).
> And both only contain character or block devices (or occasional
> directories). Nothing else.
I meant /dev/shm.
--
ciao,
Marco
sign
On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 02:51:11AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > /dev/something just feels so wrong. /dev contains block and character
> > devices, and almost nothing else (except some udev and initramfs files)
> > Why should cgroups control files, which are hardly device files, be
> > found under
On Mar 06, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > - cgroups (needed for accounting and management of system resources)
> I thought the libcgroup package handled this one, but might be wrong.
I understand that the cgconfig program from cgroup-bin does mount it
(in /mnt/cgroups/cpu, which I believe to be t
On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 05:03:05AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Do we agree to mount these filesystems on /dev/ subdirectories?
> Fedora[1] uses /dev/hugepages/ for hugetlbfs, and while we had a
> discussion on debian-devel@ about where cgroups should be mounted there
> was no clear winner.
> The u
Package: initscripts
Version: 2.87dsf-8.1
Severity: normal
I am tentatively opening this bug on initscripts to start a discussion,
but I am unsure about the best way to solve the problem.
Still, I believe it is important to solve it in time for the next
release because it is a prerequisite of some
6 matches
Mail list logo
