Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Thu, Sep 03 2009, Franck Joncourt wrote:
At a first glance there is no need to split it, and all of the binary
packages could be created from one source package as you mentionned.
However, for other distributions than Debian I do not know how their
packaging stuff
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Wed, Sep 02 2009, Franck Joncourt wrote:
I have got one tarball from upstream which is separated in fwknop-client
and fwknop-server. The programs are mainly implemented in perl.
Upstream is now working on rewriting it in C. Thus we have now a brand
new tarball
On Thu, Sep 03 2009, Franck Joncourt wrote:
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Wed, Sep 02 2009, Franck Joncourt wrote:
I have got one tarball from upstream which is separated in fwknop-client
and fwknop-server. The programs are mainly implemented in perl.
Upstream is now working on rewriting it
(Upstream is CCed, please keep it that way)
PS: Mail previously sent to debian-mentor, but I did not get any
answers, therefore I try on devel.
Hi,
I am the maintainer of fwknop:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/f/fwknop.html
The FireWall KNock OPerator implements an authorization scheme called
On Wed, Sep 02 2009, Franck Joncourt wrote:
I have got one tarball from upstream which is separated in fwknop-client
and fwknop-server. The programs are mainly implemented in perl.
Upstream is now working on rewriting it in C. Thus we have now a brand
new tarball available known as
5 matches
Mail list logo