On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 01:35:39AM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> * Sebastien J. Gross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-14 00:08]:
> > AFAIK cvs-conf had been odopted.
>
> He told me in private mail that he doesn't have the time for it.
Ok due to its unconformity to many standards you can remove i
* Sebastien J. Gross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-14 00:08]:
> AFAIK cvs-conf had been odopted.
He told me in private mail that he doesn't have the time for it.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 11:20:06PM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> * Sebastien J. Gross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-22 22:08]:
> > I would like to orphan some packages that I can't maintain any longer
> > due to a lack of time or some which are obsolete today.
> >
> > cvs-conf
> > cwwm
> > jpeg
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 11:20:06PM +1100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > cvs-conf
> > cwwm
> > jpegoptim
> > libfork-perl
> > metalog
> > pip
>
> These packages still don't have a new maintainer. Sebastien, which
> packages are "obsolete today"? I'll get those removes and properly
> orphan the rest
* Jeremy T. Bouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-22 17:35]:
> I'll take a look at cvs-conf and see if it's something I would
> actually use as I've considered doing something with configurations in
> CVS recently for both work and home and this sounds like it might be a
> solution... If someone
* Sebastien J. Gross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-22 22:08]:
> I would like to orphan some packages that I can't maintain any longer
> due to a lack of time or some which are obsolete today.
>
> cvs-conf
> cwwm
> jpegoptim
> libfork-perl
> metalog
> pip
These packages still don't have a new maint
6 matches
Mail list logo
