On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 01:32:06AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> I don't care what FUD is, but apparently I still don't know the
> answer to my initial question.
>
> How should python scripts be packaged ?
Unless something else in the package is architecture dependent, the
package should be Arch
Steve Kowalik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
> > That's a bug in python2.{1,2} then. What's the point of having a platform
> > neutral 'compiled' version of a script if the format changes every time the
> > wind changes direction?
> FUD. Pure FUD.
I don't care what FUD is, but appar
At 11:17 am, Friday, January 11 2002, Adam Heath mumbled:
> That's a bug in python2.{1,2} then. What's the point of having a platform
> neutral 'compiled' version of a script if the format changes every time the
> wind changes direction?
>
FUD. Pure FUD.
--
On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Malcolm Parsons wrote:
> There is no point byte compiling during package creation, as every time
> the python2.{1,2} packages are upgraded, every .py file is byte
> compiled again anyway:
>
> python2.2.postinst:
> for i in $DIRLIST ; do
> /usr/bin/python2.2
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 09:07:06PM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Malcolm Parsons wrote:
>
> > python modules should be supplied as source, and byte compiled in the
> > postinst.
>
> No, they should be byte compiled during package creation.
There is no point byte compiling during
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Malcolm Parsons wrote:
> python modules should be supplied as source, and byte compiled in the
> postinst.
No, they should be byte compiled during package creation.
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 07:01:15AM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 03:06:52PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > Is byte-compiled python script platform-dependent?
>
> Is that not correct? Or does an i386 .pyc/.pyo work on other architectures?
.pyc and .pyo files are comp
Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
> > Is byte-compiled python script platform-dependent?
>
> It is my (naive) understanding that it is not.
>
> Is that not correct? Or does an i386 .pyc/.pyo work on other architectures?
I am not quite sure.
I also wondered if it wa
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 03:06:52PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Jan 2002 15:13:08 -0500
> Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Description:
> > wajig - Simplified Debian package management front end
> > Changes:
> > wajig (0.2.11-1) unstable; urgency=low
> > .
On Tue, 08 Jan 2002 15:13:08 -0500
Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Description:
> wajig - Simplified Debian package management front end
> Changes:
> wajig (0.2.11-1) unstable; urgency=low
> .
>* Upgraded to new upstream release
> Files:
> e2a0aaa255f1fd9404ccc176c82
10 matches
Mail list logo