Nico Golde wrote:
>Hi,
>if we would drop some archs now, what is the best way of
>making new packages. Should we just fill in the archs which
>are supported in the future too to hold the load on the
>archs buildds which will be dropped low?
>
>
No. Just leave it as any u
Hallo Adam,
* Adam M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-04-12 23:09]:
> Nico Golde wrote:
> >if we would drop some archs now, what is the best way of
> >making new packages. Should we just fill in the archs which
> >are supported in the future too to hold the load on the
>
* Nico Golde wrote:
> if we would drop some archs now, what is the best way of making new
> packages. Should we just fill in the archs which are supported in
> the future too to hold the load on the archs buildds which will be
> dropped low?
No. It's called proposal because it&
Hi,
if we would drop some archs now, what is the best way of
making new packages. Should we just fill in the archs which
are supported in the future too to hold the load on the
archs buildds which will be dropped low?
regards nico
--
Nico Golde - [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GPG: 1024D/73647CFF
http
4 matches
Mail list logo