Re: Preferred way to build shared objects from PIC archives?

2002-08-26 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > No, that should work fine. I don't know what's broken... you may wish > to try extracting all the objects via ar and relinking them; that > should be pretty easy, but I'm not sure it will help. That's actually how upstream does it, but then there a

Re: Preferred way to build shared objects from PIC archives?

2002-08-26 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 09:13:35PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > The shared libraries in ncbi-tools6 and related packages currently > start out as static archives of PIC objects, which then get turned > into shared libraries with commands of the form > > gcc -shared -Wl,-soname=libddvlib.so.6 -o

Preferred way to build shared objects from PIC archives?

2002-08-25 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
The shared libraries in ncbi-tools6 and related packages currently start out as static archives of PIC objects, which then get turned into shared libraries with commands of the form gcc -shared -Wl,-soname=libddvlib.so.6 -o libddvlib.so.6.1.20020426 \ -Wl,-whole-archive libddvlib.a -Wl,-no-wh