Le mercredi 23 juillet 2014 à 16:12 -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit :
> Someone with more detailed desktop knowledge should read this over and
> correct it as necessary. This is just my understanding of what's going
> on, and I don't work with the software in question and could be wrong in
> some det
Vincent Lefevre writes:
> On 2014-07-22 19:54:10 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> logind is also not mandatory in Debian now. It's just required,
>> upstream, by all the major desktop environments.
> Not just by all the major desktop environments. It is also needed by
> hplip via dependencies[*],
On 2014-07-22 19:54:10 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> logind is also not mandatory in Debian now. It's just required, upstream,
> by all the major desktop environments.
Not just by all the major desktop environments. It is also needed
by hplip via dependencies[*], which is quite surprising for a
"H
Juliusz Chroboczek writes:
>> However, you're doing this during boot, so there *are* no active users,
>> since the system hasn't come up far enough to let anyone log in yet. So
>> it makes sense that you don't get a prompt.
> Does that mean that the new pid 1 expects users to be logged in befor
> However, you're doing this during boot, so there *are* no active users,
> since the system hasn't come up far enough to let anyone log in yet. So
> it makes sense that you don't get a prompt.
Does that mean that the new pid 1 expects users to be logged in before it
starts the system?
-- Julius
Adam Borowski writes:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 03:58:32AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
>> Well, the subject (and also the body) conveyed the wrong message, that
>> systemd is mandatory in Debian now. Which - as you also said - is
>> wrong, at least for two reasons: a.) it's logind, not systemd an
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 03:58:32AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Well, the subject (and also the body) conveyed the wrong message, that
> systemd
> is mandatory in Debian now. Which - as you also said - is wrong, at least for
> two reasons: a.) it's logind, not systemd and b.) only desktops are
Hi Steve,
thanks for the technical details, much appreciated.
On Mittwoch, 23. Juli 2014, Steve Langasek wrote:
> There was nothing in Julian's message which was a rant, so I don't think
> this response is called for.
Well, the subject (and also the body) conveyed the wrong message, that system
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 01:26:47AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Dienstag, 22. Juli 2014, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > I just tried updating testing on my system. I currently use
> > sysvinit-core (reasons below), but aptitude is telling me that I
> > should remove this in favour of systemd-sysv.
Holger Levsen writes:
> On Dienstag, 22. Juli 2014, Julian Gilbey wrote:
>> For me, this is a killer, as I still do not know how to solve the
>> problem I asked a while back on debian-user
>> (https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2014/04/msg01286.html): in
>> summary, I need to unlock an encrypte
Hi,
(as this thread has already attracted two "interesting replies", I'll try
again to convey the message which has not been heard yet... I don't have high
hopes this thread won't become a flamefest, but I want to at least try to kill
the flames before they explode...)
(And if you know systemd
11 matches
Mail list logo
