Ian Jackson writes:
> Russ Allbery writes ("Re: automake transition breakages"):
>> Well, the simple answer is that we avoid having to maintain local
>> patches against the upstream source to remove -Werror, since generally
>> it's not something over which w
Cyril Brulebois (2013-09-30):
> That's nice for well maintained packages. Not so nice when packages
> start FTBFSing in the middle of a transition because of an automake
> update, and maintainers are otherwise busy or MIA.
FWIW it took me less than 10 days after I wrote this to actually hit
this
Russ Allbery writes ("Re: automake transition breakages"):
> Cyril Brulebois writes:
> > Meaning one needs to get a fix once; a random NMUer might need to chase
> > upstream patches (never a pleasure when fixing unrelated issues). Given
> > what you wrote, I
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 10:35:06AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Cyril Brulebois writes:
> > Julian Taylor (2013-09-30):
> >> At minimum the packages using Werror should be test rebuilt before each
> >> new upload:
> >> http://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE.*-Werror
> >> The lis
* Niels Thykier (ni...@thykier.net) wrote:
> On 2013-09-30 20:38, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > * Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) wrote:
> >> Cyril Brulebois writes:
> >>> Julian Taylor (2013-09-30):
> >>
> At minimum the packages using Werror should be test rebuilt before each
> new upload:
>
On 2013-09-30 20:38, Eric Dorland wrote:
> * Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) wrote:
>> Cyril Brulebois writes:
>>> Julian Taylor (2013-09-30):
>>
At minimum the packages using Werror should be test rebuilt before each
new upload:
http://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=AM_INIT_AUTOMAK
* Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) wrote:
> Cyril Brulebois writes:
> > Julian Taylor (2013-09-30):
>
> >> At minimum the packages using Werror should be test rebuilt before each
> >> new upload:
> >> http://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE.*-Werror
>
> >> The list is small enough
Cyril Brulebois writes:
> Meaning one needs to get a fix once; a random NMUer might need to chase
> upstream patches (never a pleasure when fixing unrelated issues). Given
> what you wrote, I'm not sure what it buys us to keep -Werror in
> distribution packages, except for the possibly ticking ti
Russ Allbery (2013-09-30):
> I use -Werror for Automake for all of the packages for which I'm upstream
> and have not noticed it being a serious issue, although maybe I'm missing
> something? But I didn't have any trouble regenerating the files for my
> various packages with Automake 1.14.
That'
Cyril Brulebois writes:
> Julian Taylor (2013-09-30):
>> At minimum the packages using Werror should be test rebuilt before each
>> new upload:
>> http://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE.*-Werror
>> The list is small enough that it can be done by hand / small script.
> So that t
[ Dropping -release@ ]
Julian Taylor (2013-09-30):
> On 30.09.2013 16:58, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > Doing a rebuild is something I could try for next time. I'm not really
> > familiar with how to do that though, can you point me in the right
> > direction? What sort of lintian checks did you have i
On 30.09.2013 16:58, Eric Dorland wrote:
> Doing a rebuild is something I could try for next time. I'm not really
> familiar with how to do that though, can you point me in the right
> direction? What sort of lintian checks did you have in mind?
At minimum the packages using Werror should be test
* Ondřej Surý (ond...@sury.org) wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013, at 4:50, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > * Ondřej Surý (ond...@sury.org) wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > recent automake transition to 1.14 broke (FTBFS) at least two of my
> > > packages.
> > >
> > > Would it be possible to coordi
* Guillem Jover (guil...@debian.org) wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Mon, 2013-09-30 at 11:09:26 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> > I have seen these two breakages (so far):
> >
> > libgd2: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=724841
>
> This uses -Werror in AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE, don't do that.
Ah yes,
Hi!
On Mon, 2013-09-30 at 11:09:26 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> I have seen these two breakages (so far):
>
> libgd2: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=724841
This uses -Werror in AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE, don't do that.
> gyrus: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=724917
(g
Hi Eric,
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013, at 4:50, Eric Dorland wrote:
> * Ondřej Surý (ond...@sury.org) wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > recent automake transition to 1.14 broke (FTBFS) at least two of my
> > packages.
> >
> > Would it be possible to coordinate the (next) transition better than
> > upload&deal with
* Ondřej Surý (ond...@sury.org) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> recent automake transition to 1.14 broke (FTBFS) at least two of my
> packages.
>
> Would it be possible to coordinate the (next) transition better than
> upload&deal with breakages like we do with the rest of our packages?
Did the transition from
Hi,
recent automake transition to 1.14 broke (FTBFS) at least two of my
packages.
Would it be possible to coordinate the (next) transition better than
upload&deal with breakages like we do with the rest of our packages?
O.
--
Ondřej Surý
Knot DNS (https://www.knot-dns.cz/) – a high-performance
18 matches
Mail list logo
