On 08/01/2012 11:18 AM, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 09:56:56AM +0200, Marco Nenciarini wrote:
* Package name: barman
postgresql-barman would make it a bit easier for people to find.
Most of the other postgreql packages use the postgresql- namespace.
The postgresql-*
I usually prefer packages to use the upstream name so they are easy to find
(think other distributions).
The various postgresql-* packages are mostly plugins (PL/something) which
follow the example of postgresql-plperl-x.y (built from PG core). For real
applications like barman, that's not
Hello Ansgar, Christoph,
Christoph Berg [2012-08-01 21:12 +0200]:
The various postgresql-* packages are mostly plugins (PL/something)
Right, postgresql-X.Y-foo are server-side plugins which are specific
to a major PostgreSQL server version. They need to be versioned just
like PostgreSQL itself
Fwiw, I'm not saying packages must not use the postgresql namespace, I'd just
leave it to the maintainer to decide.
Martin Pitt mp...@debian.org schrieb:
Hello Ansgar, Christoph,
Christoph Berg [2012-08-01 21:12 +0200]:
The various postgresql-* packages are mostly plugins (PL/something)
4 matches
Mail list logo