On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 10:40:13AM -0700, Chris Hiestand wrote:
I tried the debian-user list first with no luck so I'm checking with the
experts. This seems like some kind of bug in dpkg.
So this works fine on 64-bit squeeze:
chiestand@squeeze:/tmp$ sudo dpkg -i --force-architecture
On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 10:40:13 -0700, Chris Hiestand wrote:
I tried the debian-user list first with no luck so I'm checking with
the experts.
This seems like some kind of bug in dpkg.
This is just missing dependencies or an appropriate force-option.
So this works fine on 64-bit squeeze:
Thank you for the explanation, that is very illuminating. Perhaps the man
page and dpkg error message should be updated to reflect this? I mean,
in the error message there was no mention of the dependency problem
being arch related.
Actually now that I'm trying to install from scratch instead of
On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 14:58:33 -0700, Chris Hiestand wrote:
Actually now that I'm trying to install from scratch instead of upgrade
the message seems to be different (libgtk2.0-0:any instead of libgtk2.0-0):
chiestand@wheezy:/tmp$ sudo dpkg -i --force-architecture
On Apr 20, 2012, at 3:23 PM, Guillem Jover wrote:
Well, certainly at least something clearer than libgtk2.0-0:any. I've
put that on my list of messages to clarify for 1.16.3 or 1.16.4.
thanks,
guillem
Awesome guillem, thanks.
Regarding your previous email:
On Apr 20, 2012, at 11:56
Chris Hiestand chiest...@salk.edu writes:
libxml2 source shows that it has Architecture: any, so I'd imagine
that should be not be a conflict even though there is no Multi-Arch
field.
No, that's only for source packages and indicates that the package *can*
be built on any architecture.
On Apr 20, 2012, at 4:02 PM, Chris Hiestand wrote:
I was curious about that too. It turns out that Adobe ships a bunch of
libraries
along with the compiled executable and modifies your LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
I can verify that acroread does run under Wheezy.
Actually the program is linked to
On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 16:06:19 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Chris Hiestand chiest...@salk.edu writes:
libxml2 source shows that it has Architecture: any, so I'd imagine
that should be not be a conflict even though there is no Multi-Arch
field.
No, that's only for source packages and
Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org writes:
On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 16:06:19 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
No, that's only for source packages and indicates that the package
*can* be built on any architecture. Architecture: all in a binary
package means it can be installed on any architecture;
9 matches
Mail list logo
