Bug#676122: gnome-doc-tools: Does not register itself in /etc/sgml/catalog (Re: still not fixed)

2012-06-16 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > [Subject: Re: Bug#676122: still not fixed] Please keep in mind that these appear as emails in a crowded inbox, so the subject line can be a good place to put valuable context. > I'm still getting the error. [...] > nsgmls:/etc/sgml/gnome-doc-tools.cat:8:8:E: cannot o

Bug#676122: still not fixed

2012-06-16 Thread Miroslav Suchý
I'm still getting the error. $ dpkg -l dpkg Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend |/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name Version Description +++-

Bug#627333: start-stop-daemon: Would like to be able to redirect IO of daemon process

2012-06-16 Thread Guillem Jover
On Sat, 2012-06-16 at 19:42:06 +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 02:40:27PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > > On Sat, 2012-06-16 at 13:32:01 +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > > > Would it be possible to simply write s-s-d --no-close --background > > > daemon -- $OPTS > /var/log/mydaemon.log

Bug#627333: start-stop-daemon: Would like to be able to redirect IO of daemon process

2012-06-16 Thread Marc Haber
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 02:40:27PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Sat, 2012-06-16 at 13:32:01 +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 04:50:40AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > > > I was looking into this recently and came to the conclusion that it > > > makes more sense to ask s-s-d t

Bug#627333: start-stop-daemon: Would like to be able to redirect IO of daemon process

2012-06-16 Thread Marc Haber
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 06:05:18PM +0100, Nicholas Bamber wrote: > I am sure that this comment will not be of interest to anyone, but when > I had this issue originally it happened that upstream had provided a > sort of daemon wrapper process called "duende". That is now available as > one way of s

Bug#627333: start-stop-daemon: Would like to be able to redirect IO of daemon process

2012-06-16 Thread Nicholas Bamber
I am sure that this comment will not be of interest to anyone, but when I had this issue originally it happened that upstream had provided a sort of daemon wrapper process called "duende". That is now available as one way of solving this issue. Noone would be more suprised than me if duende became

Bug#676442: dpkg-vendor is slow

2012-06-16 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Sat, 16 Jun 2012, Benjamin Drung wrote: > debchange uses dpkg-vendor to query the vendor. «dch -e ''» takes 1.3 s > with the query to dpkg-vendor and 1.1 s without that query. That's 15 % > of the total execution time. Having a slow debchange is annoying. The > time is accumulating if debch

Bug#676442: dpkg-vendor is slow

2012-06-16 Thread Benjamin Drung
Am Donnerstag, den 07.06.2012, 06:59 +0200 schrieb Guillem Jover: > Hi! > > On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 01:25:07 +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote: > > Package: dpkg-dev > > Version: 1.16.1.2ubuntu7 > > Severity: normal > > File: /usr/bin/dpkg-vendor > > > dpkg-vendor is small useful program that is used by

Bug#627333: start-stop-daemon: Would like to be able to redirect IO of daemon process

2012-06-16 Thread Guillem Jover
On Sat, 2012-06-16 at 13:32:01 +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 04:50:40AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > > I was looking into this recently and came to the conclusion that it > > makes more sense to ask s-s-d to not close the file descriptors, which > > would allow the caller to s

Bug#627333: start-stop-daemon: Would like to be able to redirect IO of daemon process

2012-06-16 Thread Marc Haber
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 04:50:40AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 16:06:24 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > > Marc Haber wrote: > > > On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 05:05:33PM +0100, Nicholas Bamber wrote: > > > > >> It would be nice to have --stderr, --stdout and --stdin options to

Bug#521813: lapack: update-alternatives breaks application linking

2012-06-16 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi Sylvestre, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > I will be very happy to have help (or a patch) for this bug. There is a patch at . Anything more flexible will require infrastructure that does not exist. What do you think should be done? Thanks, Jonathan -- To UNSUB

Processed: block 598638 with 521813

2012-06-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 598638 with 521813 Bug #598638 [libatlas3gf-base] lapack: update-alternatives breaks application linking Bug #576972 [libatlas3gf-base] libatlas3gf-base: octave does not work with this version Bug #624318 [libatlas3gf-base] Subject: liblap